623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27259084)
1. Evaluation of deformable image registration for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy.
Li X; Zhang YY; Shi YH; Zhou LH; Zhen X
Technol Health Care; 2016 Apr; 24 Suppl 2():S747-55. PubMed ID: 27259084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive evaluation of ten deformable image registration algorithms for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head & neck radiotherapy.
Li X; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wu S; Xiao Y; Gu X; Zhen X; Zhou L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175906. PubMed ID: 28414799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.
Hammers JE; Pirozzi S; Lindsay D; Kaidar-Person O; Tan X; Chen RC; Das SK; Mavroidis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 32058663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of software-assisted contour propagation from planning CT to cone beam CT in head and neck radiotherapy.
Hvid CA; Elstrøm UV; Jensen K; Alber M; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):1324-1330. PubMed ID: 27556786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deformable image registration based automatic CT-to-CT contour propagation for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy in the routine clinical setting.
Kumarasiri A; Siddiqui F; Liu C; Yechieli R; Shah M; Pradhan D; Zhong H; Chetty IJ; Kim J
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121712. PubMed ID: 25471959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Williamson TD; Yang J; Wisdom PG; Zhu XR; Frank SJ; Fuller CD; Gunn GB; Gao S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):92-100. PubMed ID: 31541526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy.
Broggi S; Scalco E; Belli ML; Logghe G; Verellen D; Moriconi S; Chiara A; Palmisano A; Mellone R; Fiorino C; Rizzo G
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 16(3):373-381. PubMed ID: 28168934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Daily kV cone-beam CT and deformable image registration as a method for studying dosimetric consequences of anatomic changes in adaptive IMRT of head and neck cancer.
Elstrøm UV; Wysocka BA; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1101-8. PubMed ID: 20831502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations.
Veiga C; McClelland J; Moinuddin S; Lourenço A; Ricketts K; Annkah J; Modat M; Ourselin S; D'Souza D; Royle G
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031703. PubMed ID: 24593707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.
Landry G; Nijhuis R; Dedes G; Handrack J; Thieke C; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Baroni G; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1354-66. PubMed ID: 25735290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Thor M; Petersen JB; Bentzen L; Høyer M; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 21767192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Uncertainties in dose warping due to the choice of deformable registration algorithm.
Veiga C; Lourenço AM; Mouinuddin S; van Herk M; Modat M; Ourselin S; Royle G; McClelland JR
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):760-9. PubMed ID: 25652490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Block Matching deformable registration algorithm in the field of head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy.
Huger S; Graff P; Harter V; Marchesi V; Royer P; Diaz JC; Aouadi S; Wolf D; Peiffert D; Noel A
Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24090743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
Huang Y; Li C; Wang H; Hu Q; Wang R; Chang C; Ma W; Li W; Wu H; Zhang Y
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():82-87. PubMed ID: 32097874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Target and organ dose estimation from intensity modulated head and neck radiation therapy using 3 deformable image registration algorithms.
Kumarasiri A; Liu C; Siddiqui F; Zhong H; Chetty IJ; Kim J
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(4):e317-25. PubMed ID: 25752720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of an in-house hybrid DIR method to NiftyReg on CBCT and CT images for head and neck cancer.
Jiang C; Huang Y; Ding S; Gong X; Yuan X; Wang S; Li J; Zhang Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 23(3):e13540. PubMed ID: 35084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating deformable image registration and scatter correction for CBCT-based dose calculation in adaptive IMPT.
Kurz C; Kamp F; Park YK; Zöllner C; Rit S; Hansen D; Podesta M; Sharp GC; Li M; Reiner M; Hofmaier J; Neppl S; Thieke C; Nijhuis R; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Winey BA; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5635. PubMed ID: 27782706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance validation of deformable image registration in the pelvic region.
Zambrano V; Furtado H; Fabri D; Lütgendorf-Caucig C; Góra J; Stock M; Mayer R; Birkfellner W; Georg D
J Radiat Res; 2013 Jul; 54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i120-8. PubMed ID: 23824115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deformable image registration and interobserver variation in contour propagation for radiation therapy planning.
Riegel AC; Antone JG; Zhang H; Jain P; Raince J; Rea A; Bergamo AM; Kapur A; Potters L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):347-357. PubMed ID: 27167289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative evaluation of the performance of different deformable image registration algorithms in helical, axial, and cone-beam CT images using a mobile phantom.
Ali I; Alsbou N; Jaskowiak J; Ahmad S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):62-73. PubMed ID: 29446235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
