These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27259117)
1. A comprehensive numerical analysis of background phase correction with V-SHARP. Özbay PS; Deistung A; Feng X; Nanz D; Reichenbach JR; Schweser F NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27259117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Background field removal technique using regularization enabled sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data with varying kernel sizes. Kan H; Kasai H; Arai N; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):1026-33. PubMed ID: 27114339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain. Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization. Sun H; Wilman AH Magn Reson Med; 2014 Mar; 71(3):1151-7. PubMed ID: 23666788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping at 3 T and 1.5 T: Evaluation of Consistency and Reproducibility. Hinoda T; Fushimi Y; Okada T; Fujimoto K; Liu C; Yamamoto A; Okada T; Kido A; Togashi K Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):522-30. PubMed ID: 25900085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint 2D and 3D phase processing for quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to 2D echo-planar imaging. Wei H; Zhang Y; Gibbs E; Chen NK; Wang N; Liu C NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 26887812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Background field removal for susceptibility mapping of human brain with large susceptibility variations. Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):2025-2037. PubMed ID: 30298547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range. Wei H; Dibb R; Zhou Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Wang N; Liu C NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1294-303. PubMed ID: 26313885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive fixed-point iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithm for MR imaging reconstruction using compressed sensing. Wu G; Luo S Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 24512794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An iterative spherical mean value method for background field removal in MRI. Wen Y; Zhou D; Liu T; Spincemaille P; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):1065-71. PubMed ID: 24254415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficient concomitant and remanence field artifact reduction in ultra-low-field MRI using a frequency-space formulation. Hsu YC; Vesanen PT; Nieminen JO; Zevenhoven KC; Dabek J; Parkkonen L; Chern IL; Ilmoniemi RJ; Lin FH Magn Reson Med; 2014 Mar; 71(3):955-65. PubMed ID: 23670955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase processing for quantitative susceptibility mapping of regions with large susceptibility and lack of signal. Fortier V; Levesque IR Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jun; 79(6):3103-3113. PubMed ID: 29130526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method. Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) regularization for compressed sensing MRI using an augmented Lagrangian scheme. Mehranian A; Rad HS; Rahmim A; Ay MR; Zaidi H Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1399-411. PubMed ID: 23891179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for phase MRI and QSM: removal of background field contributions from sources outside the region of interest. Schweser F; Robinson SD; de Rochefort L; Li W; Bredies K NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27717080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]