152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27260559)
1. Noninvasive Failure Load Prediction of Vertebrae with Simulated Lytic Defects and Biomaterial Augmentation.
Giambini H; Fang Z; Zeng H; Camp JJ; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2016 Aug; 22(8):717-24. PubMed ID: 27260559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty.
Matsuura Y; Giambini H; Ogawa Y; Fang Z; Thoreson AR; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; An KN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22):E1291-6. PubMed ID: 25077904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive imaging predicts failure load of the spine with simulated osteolytic defects.
Whealan KM; Kwak SD; Tedrow JR; Inoue K; Snyder BD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1240-51. PubMed ID: 11005515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable and biodegradable copolymer P(PF-co-CL) in a cadaveric vertebral body defect model.
Fang Z; Giambini H; Zeng H; Camp JJ; Dadsetan M; Robb RA; An KN; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Tissue Eng Part A; 2014 Mar; 20(5-6):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24256208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Female Human Spines with Simulated Osteolytic Defects: CT-based Structural Analysis of Vertebral Body Strength.
Alkalay R; Adamson R; Miropolsky A; Hackney D
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):436-444. PubMed ID: 29869960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting failure of thoracic vertebrae with simulated and actual metastatic defects.
Windhagen HJ; Hipp JA; Silva MJ; Lipson SJ; Hayes WC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):313-9. PubMed ID: 9372783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis and computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis of rat tibia with simulated lytic defects.
Rennick JA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Kimbaris J; Tseng A; Masoudi A; Nayeb-Hashemi H; Vaziri A; Snyder BD
J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2701-9. PubMed ID: 23972429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT-based structural analyses of vertebral fractures with polymeric augmentation: A study of cadaveric three-level spine segments.
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Miller Ii AL; Xu H; Xu H; Li Y; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jun; 133():104395. PubMed ID: 33872967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma and metastatic bladder cancer: a preliminary cadaveric investigation.
Oakland RJ; Furtado NR; Timothy J; Hall RM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Nov; 9(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 18976181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated CT-based analysis to detect changes in the prevalence of lytic bone metastases from breast cancer.
Skrinskas T; Clemons M; Freedman O; Weller I; Whyne CM
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2009; 26(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 18941910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative characterization of metastatic disease in the spine. Part II. Histogram-based analyses.
Whyne C; Hardisty M; Wu F; Skrinskas T; Clemons M; Gordon L; Basran PS
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3279-85. PubMed ID: 17879791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of the metastatic spine pre and post vertebroplasty.
Ahn H; Mousavi P; Roth S; Reidy D; Finkelstein J; Whyne C
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 16770214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.
Whyne CM; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):652-60. PubMed ID: 12671351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postfracture instability of vertebrae with simulated defects can be predicted from computed tomography data.
Windhagen H; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1775-81. PubMed ID: 10888945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can micro-imaging based analysis methods quantify structural integrity of rat vertebrae with and without metastatic involvement?
Hojjat SP; Beek M; Akens MK; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2012 Sep; 45(14):2342-8. PubMed ID: 22858318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional finite element models estimate the strength of metastatic human vertebrae despite alterations of the bone's tissue and structure.
Stadelmann MA; Schenk DE; Maquer G; Lenherr C; Buck FM; Bosshardt DD; Hoppe S; Theumann N; Alkalay RN; Zysset PK
Bone; 2020 Dec; 141():115598. PubMed ID: 32829037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical analysis of intravertebral pressures during vertebroplasty of cadaveric spines with and without simulated metastases.
Reidy D; Ahn H; Mousavi P; Finkelstein J; Whyne CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1534-9. PubMed ID: 12865840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine.
Nouda S; Tomita S; Kin A; Kawahara K; Kinoshita M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2613-8. PubMed ID: 19910764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prophylactic vertebroplasty can decrease the fracture risk of adjacent vertebrae: an in vitro cadaveric study.
Aquarius R; Homminga J; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot N; Tanck E
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jul; 36(7):944-8. PubMed ID: 24736018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
