These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27261280)
21. Release and degradation of environmental DNA and RNA in a marine system. Wood SA; Biessy L; Latchford JL; Zaiko A; von Ammon U; Audrezet F; Cristescu ME; Pochon X Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 704():135314. PubMed ID: 31780169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An optimised eDNA protocol for detecting fish in lentic and lotic freshwaters using a small water volume. Muha TP; Robinson CV; Garcia de Leaniz C; Consuegra S PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219218. PubMed ID: 31314760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Functional responses of an invasive mud crab across a salinity gradient. Cuthbert RN; Briski E Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151684. PubMed ID: 34793792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Potential of Environmental DNA to Evaluate Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Eradication Efforts: An Experimental Test and Case Study. Dunker KJ; Sepulveda AJ; Massengill RL; Olsen JB; Russ OL; Wenburg JK; Antonovich A PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162277. PubMed ID: 27626271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples. Buxton AS; Groombridge JJ; Griffiths RA PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191737. PubMed ID: 29352294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accurate detection and quantification of seasonal abundance of American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) using ddPCR eDNA assays. Everts T; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; De Regge N; Jacquemyn H; Brys R Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11282. PubMed ID: 34050232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA. Piaggio AJ; Engeman RM; Hopken MW; Humphrey JS; Keacher KL; Bruce WE; Avery ML Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Mar; 14(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 24119154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Degradation and dispersion limit environmental DNA detection of rare amphibians in wetlands: Increasing efficacy of sampling designs. Goldberg CS; Strickler KM; Fremier AK Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 633():695-703. PubMed ID: 29602110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Current status and topical issues on the use of eDNA-based targeted detection of rare animal species. Duarte S; Simões L; Costa FO Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 904():166675. PubMed ID: 37647964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. Deiner K; Altermatt F PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88786. PubMed ID: 24523940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Protocol optimization of eDNA analysis workflow for detecting Hucho bleekeri.]. Jiang W; Wang QJ; Deng J; Zhao H; Kong F; Zhang HX Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jul; 27(7):2372-2378. PubMed ID: 29737148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of an invasive aquatic plant in natural water bodies using environmental DNA. Anglès d'Auriac MB; Strand DA; Mjelde M; Demars BOL; Thaulow J PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219700. PubMed ID: 31299064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. eDNA and specific primers for early detection of invasive species--A case study on the bivalve Rangia cuneata, currently spreading in Europe. Ardura A; Zaiko A; Martinez JL; Samulioviene A; Semenova A; Garcia-Vazquez E Mar Environ Res; 2015 Dec; 112(Pt B):48-55. PubMed ID: 26453004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. I Environmental DNA sampling is more sensitive than a traditional survey technique for detecting an aquatic invader. Smart AS; Tingley R; Weeks AR; van Rooyen AR; McCarthy MA Ecol Appl; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1944-52. PubMed ID: 26591459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using eDNA to detect the distribution and density of invasive crayfish in the Honghe-Hani rice terrace World Heritage site. Cai W; Ma Z; Yang C; Wang L; Wang W; Zhao G; Geng Y; Yu DW PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177724. PubMed ID: 28505200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species. Doi H; Takahara T; Minamoto T; Matsuhashi S; Uchii K; Yamanaka H Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5601-8. PubMed ID: 25850372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive. Hering D; Borja A; Jones JI; Pont D; Boets P; Bouchez A; Bruce K; Drakare S; Hänfling B; Kahlert M; Leese F; Meissner K; Mergen P; Reyjol Y; Segurado P; Vogler A; Kelly M Water Res; 2018 Jul; 138():192-205. PubMed ID: 29602086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development and validation of eDNA markers for the detection of Crepidula fornicata in environmental samples. Miralles L; Parrondo M; Hernández de Rojas A; Garcia-Vazquez E; Borrell YJ Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Sep; 146():827-830. PubMed ID: 31426224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]