These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2726206)

  • 1. Image analysis of radiolucencies in approximal enamel: a comparison of xeroradiographic and conventional film images.
    Shearer AC; Pitts NB; Wilson NH; Hutton JB; Wastell DG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Apr; 67(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 2726206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of approximal radiolucencies in enamel: a preliminary comparison between experienced clinicians and an image analysis method.
    Pitts NB
    J Dent; 1987 Oct; 15(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 3479462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pilot study of a modified radiographic technique for detecting early proximal cavities.
    Akbari M; Zarch HH; Movagharipour F; Ahrari F
    Caries Res; 2013; 47(6):612-6. PubMed ID: 24061285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 6588117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of dental xeroradiographs in periodontics. Comparison with conventional radiographs.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Armitage GC
    J Periodontol; 1980 Jan; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6928465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of periapical lesions.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Dent Res; 1984 Jun; 63(6):910-3. PubMed ID: 6588078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital imaging fiber-optic trans-illumination, F-speed radiographic film and depth of approximal lesions.
    Young DA; Featherstone JD
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 136(12):1682-7. PubMed ID: 16383050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Xeroradiography of dental structures. III. Pilot clinical studies.
    Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Sep; 48(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 289933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
    Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further development of a computer-aided image analysis method of quantifying radiolucencies in approximal enamel.
    Pitts NB; Renson CE
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 3521862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approximal radiolucencies in partially overlapped enamel: the need for quantitation and a preliminary assessment of a computer-aided image analysis method.
    Pitts NB
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Apr; 17(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 3459200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.