These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2726206)

  • 21. Radiographic amelocemental junction and alveolar crest: effect of X-ray beam angulation.
    Jenkins SM; Dummer PM; Newcombe RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Sep; 22(9):679-84. PubMed ID: 7490667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
    Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment.
    Stroud JL; English J; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Apr; 68(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9564423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Approximal caries diagnosis in epidemiological studies: transillumination or bitewing radiographs?
    Obry-Musset AM; Cahen PM; Turlot JC; Frank RM
    J Biol Buccale; 1988 Mar; 16(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 3165088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: a comparison of xeroradiography versus film.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Forsythe AA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Aug; 64(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 3476902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 'Monitoring the behaviour of posterior approximal carious lesions by image analysis of serial standardised bitewing radiographs'.
    Pitts NB
    Br Dent J; 1987 May; 162(10):378-9. PubMed ID: 3472539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exposure times at which dental xeroradiographs and radiographs have comparable optical density.
    Alexander JB; Andrews JD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Sep; 66(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 3174071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro enamel thickness measurements with ultrasound.
    Sindi KH; Bubb NL; Gutteridge DL; Evans JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 25438856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of dental xeroradiography and conventional film techniques for the frequency and significance of image artifacts.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Littman RI
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Nov; 60(5):546-52. PubMed ID: 3903601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of xeroradiographs and two types of film for detecting caries in approximal surfaces of primary teeth.
    White SC; McMullin K
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 3463427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer-based image analysis of natural approximal caries on radiographic films.
    Heaven TJ; Firestone AR; Feagin FF
    J Dent Res; 1992 Apr; 71 Spec No():846-9. PubMed ID: 1592972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.