These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27262416)

  • 21. Ecological inferences about marine mammals from passive acoustic data.
    Fleishman E; Cholewiak D; Gillespie D; Helble T; Klinck H; Nosal EM; Roch MA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Oct; 98(5):1633-1647. PubMed ID: 37142263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Climate change and freshwater biodiversity: detected patterns, future trends and adaptations in northern regions.
    Heino J; Virkkala R; Toivonen H
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2009 Feb; 84(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 19032595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of different analysis techniques and recording duty cycles on passive acoustic monitoring of killer whales.
    Riera A; Ford JK; Ross Chapman N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2393-404. PubMed ID: 23968036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta-analysis.
    Alcocer I; Lima H; Sugai LSM; Llusia D
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Dec; 97(6):2209-2236. PubMed ID: 35978471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Passive acoustic surveys for predicting species' distributions: Optimising detection probability.
    Hagens SV; Rendall AR; Whisson DA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199396. PubMed ID: 30020938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decoding Group Vocalizations: The Acoustic Energy Distribution of Chorus Howls Is Useful to Determine Wolf Reproduction.
    Palacios V; López-Bao JV; Llaneza L; Fernández C; Font E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153858. PubMed ID: 27144887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal.
    Sueur J; Pavoine S; Hamerlynck O; Duvail S
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e4065. PubMed ID: 19115006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vocal traits and diet explain avian sensitivities to anthropogenic noise.
    Francis CD
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 May; 21(5):1809-20. PubMed ID: 25688983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extending Species-Area Relationships Into the Realm of Ecoacoustics: The Soundscape-Area Relationship.
    Luypaert T; Bueno AS; Haugaasen T; Peres CA
    Ecol Lett; 2024 Oct; 27(10):e14529. PubMed ID: 39388200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.
    Dudgeon D; Arthington AH; Gessner MO; Kawabata Z; Knowler DJ; Lévêque C; Naiman RJ; Prieur-Richard AH; Soto D; Stiassny ML; Sullivan CA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 May; 81(2):163-82. PubMed ID: 16336747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monitoring spatial and temporal soundscape features within ecologically significant U.S. National Marine Sanctuaries.
    Stanley JA; Van Parijs SM; Davis GE; Sullivan M; Hatch LT
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Dec; 31(8):e02439. PubMed ID: 34374153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of extracting indices from large-scale acoustic recordings to monitor biodiversity.
    Buxton RT; McKenna MF; Clapp M; Meyer E; Stabenau E; Angeloni LM; Crooks K; Wittemyer G
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1174-1184. PubMed ID: 29676813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ecological Insights from Pelagic Habitats Acquired Using Active Acoustic Techniques.
    Benoit-Bird KJ; Lawson GL
    Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2016; 8():463-90. PubMed ID: 26515810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustic assessment of species richness and assembly rules in ensiferan communities from temperate ecosystems.
    Roca IT; Proulx R
    Ecology; 2016 Jan; 97(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 27008781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pairing a user-friendly machine-learning animal sound detector with passive acoustic surveys for occupancy modeling of an endangered primate.
    Wood CM; Barceinas Cruz A; Kahl S
    Am J Primatol; 2023 Aug; 85(8):e23507. PubMed ID: 37211970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of climate on acoustic signals: does atmospheric sound absorption matter for bird song and bat echolocation?
    Snell-Rood EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1650-8. PubMed ID: 22352535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the accuracy of acoustic seabed classification for mapping coral reef environments in South Florida (Broward County, USA).
    Moyer RP; Riegl B; Banks K; Dodge RE
    Rev Biol Trop; 2005 May; 53 Suppl 1():175-84. PubMed ID: 17465157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Traffic noise affects forest bird species in a protected tropical forest.
    Arévalo JE; Newhard K
    Rev Biol Trop; 2011 Jun; 59(2):969-80. PubMed ID: 21717861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning.
    Terrado M; Sabater S; Chaplin-Kramer B; Mandle L; Ziv G; Acuña V
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 540():63-70. PubMed ID: 25836757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Listening forward: approaching marine biodiversity assessments using acoustic methods.
    Mooney TA; Di Iorio L; Lammers M; Lin TH; Nedelec SL; Parsons M; Radford C; Urban E; Stanley J
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Aug; 7(8):201287. PubMed ID: 32968541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.