416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27262521)
1. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subcategorization of Ultrasonographic BI-RADS Category 4: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions and Influence of Clinical Factors on Positive Predictive Value.
He P; Cui LG; Chen W; Yang RL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 May; 45(5):1253-1258. PubMed ID: 30799123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.
Stavros AT; Freitas AG; deMello GGN; Barke L; McDonald D; Kaske T; Wolverton D; Honick A; Stanzani D; Padovan AH; Moura APC; de Campos MCV
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4307-4315. PubMed ID: 28396996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer.
Spinelli Varella MA; Teixeira da Cruz J; Rauber A; Varella IS; Fleck JF; Moreira LF
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 29066139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.
Gweon HM; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim JA; Chung J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 22302210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses.
Jales RM; Sarian LO; Torresan R; Marussi EF; Alvares BR; Derchain S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 23540948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.
Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcategory classifications of Breast Imaging and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions on MRI.
Honda M; Kataoka M; Kawaguchi K; Iima M; Miyake KK; Kishimoto AO; Ota R; Ohashi A; Toi M; Nakamoto Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 32870440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement in Ultrasound BI-RADS Classification and Real-Time Elastography Tsukuba Score Assessment of Breast Lesions.
Schwab F; Redling K; Siebert M; Schötzau A; Schoenenberger CA; Zanetti-Dällenbach R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2622-2629. PubMed ID: 27503826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-mass-like breast lesions at ultrasonography: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment.
Ko KH; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Peng YJ; Tung HJ; Chu CM; Chang TH; Chang WC; Wu YC; Lin YP; Hsu GC
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 25455412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images.
Youk JH; Jung I; Yoon JH; Kim SH; Kim YM; Lee EH; Jeong SH; Kim MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 27324292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The value of ultrasound classification in BI-RADS category 4 of breast complex cystic masses].
Yao JP; Niu LJ; Wang Y; Geng CY; Chang Q; Chen Y; Zhu L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 40(9):672-675. PubMed ID: 30293391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.
Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E
Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it.
Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Kim EK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 May; 37(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 21458145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
