These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

600 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27262561)

  • 1. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg TK; Furunes H; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e224291. PubMed ID: 35344046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest G; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Jacobs W; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2244-63. PubMed ID: 26184719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
    Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 13(2):641-650. PubMed ID: 33565271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
    Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ambulatory uniportal versus biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis-cohort study using a prospective registry.
    Wu PH; Chin BZJ; Lee P; Woon CY; Kim HS; George R; Lin S; Tan YG
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Aug; 32(8):2726-2735. PubMed ID: 36862219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
    Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcome after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with insignificant lower extremity pain. A prospective cohort study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 30669998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
    Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.
    Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.
    Soliman HM
    Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2282-9. PubMed ID: 26165475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ahmad S; Hamad A; Bhalla A; Turner S; Balain B; Jaffray D
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):414-419. PubMed ID: 27272494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.