These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Is this peer review or revenge? Cassidy R Med Econ; 1981 Mar; 58(6):80-3, 87, 89-91. PubMed ID: 10250276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Antitrust and hospital peer review. Blumstein JF; Sloan FA Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):7-92. PubMed ID: 10295966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. If you should lose a peer review suit. Holoweiko M Med Econ; 1988 Dec; 65(24):140-4, 147-8, 150-1 passim. PubMed ID: 10290905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review in the wake of Patrick. McCormick B Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Oregon responds to physicians' fears of peer review. Koska MT Hospitals; 1990 Jan; 64(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 2294040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The physician and hospital privileges. Hirsch HL Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():179-91. PubMed ID: 10287959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations. Mustes JJ; Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Friedman v. Delaware County Memorial Hospital: judicial protection for good-faith peer review. Dalton JF Healthspan; 1988 Jan; 5(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 10286662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review after Patrick case is alive and well. Holthaus D Hospitals; 1988 Oct; 62(20):34. PubMed ID: 3169708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]