200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27262727)
1. Delivering elsewhere between the first and second deliveries is a risk marker for obstetric complications in the second delivery.
Reichman O; Gal M; Nezer M; Shen O; Calderon-Margalit R; Farkash R; Samueloff A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 294(6):1141-1144. PubMed ID: 27262727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Delivery during time of shift change is not a risk factor for obstetric complication: a historical cohort study].
Reichman O; Samueloff A; Gdansky E; Yekel Y; Calderon-Margalit R
Harefuah; 2015 Mar; 154(3):159-61, 213. PubMed ID: 25962243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determinants of adverse neonatal outcome in vaginal deliveries complicated by suspected intraamniotic infection.
Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Tsur A; Shai D; Cahan T; Yoeli R; Meyer R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1345-1352. PubMed ID: 32749533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twins: risk factors and neonatal outcome--a single center experience.
Aviram A; Weiser I; Ashwal E; Bar J; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 24853342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neonatal and Maternal Short-Term Outcome Parameters in Instrument-Assisted Vaginal Delivery Compared to Second Stage Cesarean Section in Labour: A Retrospective 11-Year Analysis.
Polkowski M; Kuehnle E; Schippert C; Kundu S; Hillemanns P; Staboulidou I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 28222428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of changes in the mode of twin deliveries over the years].
Madej A; Szymusik I; Oledzka M; Kosińska-Kaczyńska K; Bomba-Opoń DA; Wielgoś M
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):754-9. PubMed ID: 23383561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk factors predicting an emergency cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin.
Spiegel E; Kessous R; Sergienko R; Sheiner E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 25716669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors.
Pallasmaa N; Ekblad U; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Uotila J; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Hurme S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Jul; 89(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 20583935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grouping Parturients by Parity, Previous-Cesarean, and Mode of Delivery (P-C-MoD Classification) Better Identifies Groups at Risk for Postpartum Hemorrhage.
Reichman O; Gal M; Sela HY; Khayyat I; Emanuel M; Samueloff A
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 33(12):1133-7. PubMed ID: 27322665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there an association between short interval from previous cesarean section and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcome?
Kessous R; Sheiner E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(10):1003-6. PubMed ID: 23311913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiovascular and obstetrical outcomes among delivering patients with Marfan or Loeys-Dietz syndrome: a retrospective analysis by hospital delivery setting.
Whelan AR; Thorsen MM; MacCarrick G; Russo ML
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Apr; 6(4):101340. PubMed ID: 38460826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pregnancy outcome and factors affecting vaginal delivery of twins at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu.
Nwankwo TO; Aniebue UU; Ezenkwele E; Nwafor MI
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 23974745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perinatal outcomes of vacuum assisted versus cesarean deliveries for prolonged second stage of delivery at term
Shmueli A; Salman L; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Gabbay-Benziv R; Yogev Y; Aviram A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(8):886-889. PubMed ID: 27188481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries.
Kor-Anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Lim A; Chongsuviwatwong V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18259902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which way is better to deliver the very heavy baby: mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcome.
Levin G; Meyer R; Yagel S; David M; Yinon Y; Rottenstreich A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 301(4):941-948. PubMed ID: 32125523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mode of delivery and other pregnancy outcomes of patients with documented scoliosis.
Lebel DE; Sergienko R; Wiznitzer A; Velan GJ; Sheiner E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jun; 25(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 22070615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
