BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27262971)

  • 21. Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.
    Coviello EM; Iqbal SN; Grantz KL; Huang CC; Landy HJ; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):100.e1-100.e9. PubMed ID: 30273585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effect of induced labor on delivery outcome of pregnant women undergoing vaginal trial of labor after cesarean section].
    Cao YL; Zou LY; Zhang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 54(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 31550773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Yeh J; Wactawski-Wende J; Shelton JA; Reschke J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):144. PubMed ID: 16389024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Levine LD; Downes KL; Parry S; Elovitz MA; Sammel MD; Srinivas SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2):254.e1-254.e7. PubMed ID: 29224730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor.
    Hendler I; Bujold E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 15291999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.
    Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K
    Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g.
    Zelop CM; Shipp TD; Repke JT; Cohen A; Lieberman E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):903-5. PubMed ID: 11641675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean.
    Liao Q; Luo J; Zheng L; Han Q; Liu Z; Qi W; Yang T; Yan J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):639. PubMed ID: 33081753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.
    Durnwald C; Mercer B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15280110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.
    Rizzo G; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():385-390. PubMed ID: 33279807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Bhide A; Caric V; Arulkumaran S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 26952353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study.
    Aviram A; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E; Yoon EW; Melamed N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 231(1):124.e1-124.e11. PubMed ID: 37979823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Previous preterm cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture in subsequent trial of labor-a national cohort study.
    Mantel Ä; Ajne G; Lindblad Wollmann C; Stephansson O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):380.e1-380.e13. PubMed ID: 33002499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus does not influence the success rates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Marchiano D; Elkousy M; Stevens E; Peipert J; Macones G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 15042016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia -- effect on subsequent trial of labor.
    Abildgaard H; Ingerslev MD; Nickelsen C; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 23025257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Grobman WA; Lai Y; Landon MB; Spong CY; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):806-12. PubMed ID: 17400840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort.
    Abdel Aziz A; Abd Rabbo A; Sayed Ahmed WA; Khamees RE; Atwa KA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jul; 134(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 27118509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.