BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27266422)

  • 1. Accuracy of the vivofit activity tracker.
    Alsubheen SA; George AM; Baker A; Rohr LE; Basset FA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2016 Aug; 40(6):298-306. PubMed ID: 27266422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running.
    Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C
    J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
    An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke.
    Schaffer SD; Holzapfel SD; Fulk G; Bosch PR
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 33(10):788-796. PubMed ID: 28777710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation.
    Sirard JR; Masteller B; Freedson PS; Mendoza A; Hickey A
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e250. PubMed ID: 28724509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of wearable activity monitors for tracking steps and estimating energy expenditure during a graded maximal treadmill test.
    Kendall B; Bellovary B; Gothe NP
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29863968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of different stepping counters during treadmill and over ground walking.
    Simonsen MB; Thomsen MJ; Hirata RP
    Gait Posture; 2020 Jul; 80():80-83. PubMed ID: 32497979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative accuracy of fitness tracking modalities in quantifying energy expenditure.
    Dondzila C; Garner D
    J Med Eng Technol; 2016 Aug; 40(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 27280592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent Validity of the Garmin Vivofit®4 to Accurately Record Step Count in Older Adults in Challenging Environments.
    Foster JI; Williams KL; Timmer BHB; Brauer SG
    J Aging Phys Act; 2022 Oct; 30(5):833-841. PubMed ID: 34996032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure.
    Sasaki JE; Hickey A; Mavilia M; Tedesco J; John D; Kozey Keadle S; Freedson PS
    J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24770438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+ and BodyMedia SenseWear Armband to estimate energy expenditure during physical activity and sport.
    Gastin PB; Cayzer C; Dwyer D; Robertson S
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Mar; 21(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 28797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bit doesn't fit: Evaluation of a commercial activity-tracker at slower walking speeds.
    Wong CK; Mentis HM; Kuber R
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jan; 59():177-181. PubMed ID: 29049964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
    Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of Garmin Vívofit 1 and Garmin Vívofit 3 for School-Based Physical Activity Monitoring.
    Šimůnek A; Dygrýn J; Jakubec L; Neuls F; Frömel K; Welk GJ
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2019 Feb; 31(1):130-136. PubMed ID: 30304974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry.
    Kumahara H; Schutz Y; Ayabe M; Yoshioka M; Yoshitake Y; Shindo M; Ishii K; Tanaka H
    Br J Nutr; 2004 Feb; 91(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 14756909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activity trackers are not valid for step count registration when walking with crutches.
    De Ridder R; De Blaiser C
    Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():30-32. PubMed ID: 30798092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of consumer monitors for estimating energy expenditure in youth.
    LaMunion SR; Blythe AL; Hibbing PR; Kaplan AS; Clendenin BJ; Crouter SE
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2020 Feb; 45(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 31269409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of the Actical activity monitor for assessing steps and energy expenditure during walking.
    Johnson M; Meltz K; Hart K; Schmudlach M; Clarkson L; Borman K
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(8):769-76. PubMed ID: 25356920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities.
    Alinia P; Cain C; Fallahzadeh R; Shahrokni A; Cook D; Ghasemzadeh H
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Aug; 5(8):e106. PubMed ID: 28801304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.