These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27266799)

  • 1. Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests.
    Yuan KH; Chan W
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 27266799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Type I error rates and power of several versions of scaled chi-square difference tests in investigations of measurement invariance.
    Brace JC; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):467-485. PubMed ID: 27893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advances in Measurement Invariance and Mean Comparison of Latent Variables: Equivalence Testing and A Projection-Based Approach.
    Jiang G; Mai Y; Yuan KH
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1823. PubMed ID: 29114237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing consistency in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) across gender and stability of OHRQoL over time for adolescents using Structural Equation Modeling.
    Wong MC; Lau AW; Lam KF; McGrath C; Lu HX
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 39(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 21198762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Jorgensen TD; Kite BA; Chen PY; Short SD
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):708-728. PubMed ID: 29172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving measurement-invariance assessments: correcting entrenched testing deficiencies.
    Hayduk LA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 27716067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating Equivalence Testing Methods for Measurement Invariance.
    Counsell A; Cribbie RA; Flora DB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):312-328. PubMed ID: 31389729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Curran PJ; Bollen KA; Paxton P; Kirby J; Chen F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jan; 37(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 26824167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of error structure misspecification when testing measurement invariance and latent-factor mean difference using MIMIC and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Joo SH; Kim ES
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2688-2699. PubMed ID: 30242617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smoothed Quantiles for
    Yuan KH; Gomer B; Marcoulides KM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):223-242. PubMed ID: 33400593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Latent Means Without Mean Structure Models: A Projection-Based Approach.
    Deng L; Yuan KH
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):802-29. PubMed ID: 26661857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing measurement invariance of the children's depression inventory in Chinese and Italian primary school student samples.
    Wu W; Lu Y; Tan F; Yao S; Steca P; Abela JR; Hankin BL
    Assessment; 2012 Dec; 19(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 21911438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing strong factorial invariance using three-level structural equation modeling.
    Jak S
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():745. PubMed ID: 25120499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing nonlinear regression parameters under heteroscedastic, normally distributed errors.
    Kimura DK
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 2242410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.
    Rhemtulla M
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):348-368. PubMed ID: 26828780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shame for disrespecting evidence: the personal consequences of insufficient respect for structural equation model testing.
    Hayduk LA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():124. PubMed ID: 25430437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.
    Putnick DL; Bornstein MH
    Dev Rev; 2016 Sep; 41():71-90. PubMed ID: 27942093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using SAS PROC TCALIS for multigroup structural equation modelling with mean structures.
    Gu F; Wu W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):516-37. PubMed ID: 21973099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invariance of the MAST across religious groups.
    Luczak SE; Raine A; Venables PH
    J Stud Alcohol; 2001 Nov; 62(6):834-7. PubMed ID: 11838921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixture multigroup factor analysis for unraveling factor loading noninvariance across many groups.
    De Roover K; Vermunt JK; Ceulemans E
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Jun; 27(3):281-306. PubMed ID: 33271027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.