265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27267301)
1. A rating of perceived exertion scale using facial expressions for conveying exercise intensity for children and young adults.
Chen YL; Chiou WK; Tzeng YT; Lu CY; Chen SC
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):66-69. PubMed ID: 27267301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of RPE (Rating of Perceived Exertion) Scales for Session RPE.
Arney BE; Glover R; Fusco A; Cortis C; de Koning JJ; van Erp T; Jaime S; Mikat RP; Porcari JP; Foster C
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Jul; 14(7):994-996. PubMed ID: 30569764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls.
Pfeiffer KA; Pivarnik JM; Womack CJ; Reeves MJ; Malina RM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Dec; 34(12):2057-61. PubMed ID: 12471316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A BRIEF NOTE ON THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION SCALE IN MONITORING EXERCISE INTENSITY AMONG CHINESE OLDER ADULTS IN HONG KONG.
Chung PK; Zhao Y; Liu JD; Quach B
Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Dec; 121(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 26595201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the color scale of perceived exertion: preliminary validation.
Serafim TH; Tognato AC; Nakamura PM; Queiroga MR; Nakamura FY; Pereira G; Kokubun E
Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):884-900. PubMed ID: 25387039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and Reliability of Facial Rating of Perceived Exertion Scales for Training Load Monitoring.
van der Zwaard S; Hooft Graafland F; van Middelkoop C; Lintmeijer LL
J Strength Cond Res; 2023 May; 37(5):e317-e324. PubMed ID: 36227235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of rating of perceived exertion ranges in individuals in the subacute stage of stroke recovery.
Sage M; Middleton LE; Tang A; Sibley KM; Brooks D; McIlroy W
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2013; 20(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 24273299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of CR100 Scale for Session Rating of Perceived Exertion in Soccer and Its Interchangeability With the CR10.
Fanchini M; Ferraresi I; Modena R; Schena F; Coutts AJ; Impellizzeri FM
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Apr; 11(3):388-92. PubMed ID: 26309332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exercise Prescription Using a Group-Normalized Rating of Perceived Exertion in Adolescents and Adults With Spina Bifida.
Crytzer TM; Keramati M; Anthony SJ; Cheng YT; Robertson RJ; Dicianno BE
PM R; 2018 Jul; 10(7):738-747. PubMed ID: 29408563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of the validity and reliability of two perceived exertion rating scales among Hong Kong children.
Leung ML; Chung PK; Leung RW
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1047-62. PubMed ID: 12578245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise.
Robertson RJ; Goss FL; Dube J; Rutkowski J; Dupain M; Brennan C; Andreacci J
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Jan; 36(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 14707775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent and Construct Validation of a Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion in Aquatic Cycling for Young Men.
Colado JC; Brasil RM
J Sports Sci Med; 2019 Dec; 18(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 31827354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it possible to individualize intensity of eccentric cycling exercise from perceived exertion on concentric test?
Laroche D; Joussain C; Espagnac C; Morisset C; Tordi N; Gremeaux V; Casillas JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1621-1627.e1. PubMed ID: 23270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of rating perceived exertion in women with fibromyalgia: exertion-pain discrimination.
Soriano-Maldonado A; Ruiz JR; Álvarez-Gallardo IC; Segura-Jiménez V; Santalla A; Munguía-Izquierdo D
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(14):1515-22. PubMed ID: 25537003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing a modified perceived exertion scale for Alzheimer's disease.
Yu F; Demorest SL; Vock DM
Psych J; 2015 Mar; 4(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26263529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in studies of fatigue-induced postural control alterations in healthy adults: Scoping review of quantitative evidence.
Jo D; Bilodeau M
Gait Posture; 2021 Oct; 90():167-178. PubMed ID: 34492503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Subjective Perceived Exertion at the Anaerobic Threshold with the Borg CR-10 Scale.
Zamunér AR; Moreno MA; Camargo TM; Graetz JP; Rebelo AC; Tamburús NY; da Silva E
J Sports Sci Med; 2011; 10(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24149305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
Cleland BT; Ingraham BA; Pitluck MC; Woo D; Ng AV
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jun; 97(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 26836954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of the OMNI rating of perceived exertion scale for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Fragala-Pinkham M; O'Neil ME; Lennon N; Forman JL; Trost SG
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2015 Aug; 57(8):748-53. PubMed ID: 25627218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of the session-RPE method for quantifying training in Australian football: a comparison of the CR10 and CR100 scales.
Scott TJ; Black CR; Quinn J; Coutts AJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jan; 27(1):270-6. PubMed ID: 22450253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
