265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27267301)
21. The development of rating of perceived exertion-based tests of physical working capacity.
Mielke M; Housh TJ; Malek MH; Beck TW; Schmidt RJ; Johnson GO
J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan; 22(1):293-302. PubMed ID: 18296989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Test-Retest Reliability of Rating of Perceived Exertion and Agreement With 1-Repetition Maximum in Adults.
Bove AM; Lynch AD; DePaul SM; Terhorst L; Irrgang JJ; Fitzgerald GK
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Sep; 46(9):768-74. PubMed ID: 27494056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relationships of Borg's RPE 6-20 scale and heart rate in dynamic and static exercises among a sample of young Taiwanese men.
Chen YL; Chen CC; Hsia PY; Lin SK
Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Dec; 117(3):971-82. PubMed ID: 24665812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dalhousie Pictorial Scales Measuring Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion during Exercise for Children and Adolescents.
Pianosi PT; Huebner M; Zhang Z; Turchetta A; McGrath PJ
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 May; 12(5):718-26. PubMed ID: 25695139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of a new scale to measure perceived exertion in obese adolescents: the Childhood Obesity Perceived Exertion (Cope-10) Scale.
Quinart S; Groslambert A; Ecarnot F; Simon-Rigaud ML; Nicolet-Guénat M; Nègre V; Mougin F
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2016 Sep; 56(9):1013-20. PubMed ID: 26129916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Construct validity of the OMNI resistance exercise scale.
Lagally KM; Robertson RJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2006 May; 20(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 16686549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of rate of perceived exertion-based exercise training in patients with heart failure: insights from autonomic nervous system adaptations.
Iellamo F; Manzi V; Caminiti G; Vitale C; Massaro M; Cerrito A; Rosano G; Volterrani M
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 176(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 25129282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Manipulation effects of prior exercise intensity feedback by the Borg scale during open-loop cycling.
Pires FO; Hammond J
Br J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 46(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 21266335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of Omni scale of perceived exertion during prolonged cycling.
Utter AC; Kang J; Nieman DC; Dumke CL; McAnulty SR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Apr; 38(4):780-6. PubMed ID: 16679997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Omni Scale Perceived Exertion responses in obese and normal weight male adolescents during cycle exercise.
Balasekaran G; Loh MK; Govindaswamy VV; Cai SJ
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2014 Apr; 54(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 24509990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests.
Borg E; Kaijser L
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2006 Feb; 16(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 16430682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis.
Chen MJ; Fan X; Moe ST
J Sports Sci; 2002 Nov; 20(11):873-99. PubMed ID: 12430990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rating of perceived exertion - a valid method for monitoring light to vigorous exercise intensity in individuals with subjective and mild cognitive impairment?
Stuckenschneider T; Rüdiger S; Abeln V; Askew CD; Wollseiffen P; Schneider S;
Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 Mar; 20(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 31173563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validity of the CALER and OMNI-bike ratings of perceived exertion.
Barkley JE; Roemmich JN
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Apr; 40(4):760-6. PubMed ID: 18317367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of incremental and submaximal constant load tests: protocol on perceived exertion (CR10) values.
Dekerle J; Baron B; Dupont L; Garcin M; Vanvelcenaher J; Pelayo P
Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Jun; 96(3 Pt 1):896-904. PubMed ID: 12831268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Face Pain Scale and Borg Scale compared to physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Morishita S; Tsubaki A; Hotta K; Inoue T; Qin W; Kojima S; Fu JB; Onishi H
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2021 Nov; 61(11):1464-1468. PubMed ID: 33269889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validity and reliability of a Cantonese-translated rating of perceived exertion scale among Hong Kong adults.
Leung RW; Leung ML; Chung PK
Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Apr; 98(2):725-35. PubMed ID: 15141939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of two Borg exertion scales for monitoring exercise intensity in able-bodied participants, and those with paraplegia and tetraplegia.
Hutchinson MJ; Kouwijzer I; de Groot S; Goosey-Tolfrey VL
Spinal Cord; 2021 Nov; 59(11):1162-1169. PubMed ID: 34040150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Commonly Used Subjective Effort Scales May Not Predict Directly Measured Physical Workloads and Fatigue in Hispanic Farmworkers.
Thamsuwan O; Galvin K; Palmandez P; Johnson PW
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of the OMNI-cycle scale of perceived exertion in the elderly.
Guidetti L; Sgadari A; Buzzachera CF; Broccatelli M; Utter AC; Goss FL; Baldari C
J Aging Phys Act; 2011 Jul; 19(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 21727302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
