These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27267986)

  • 1. Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods.
    Ronk FR; Hooke GR; Page AC
    BMC Psychiatry; 2016 Jun; 16():187. PubMed ID: 27267986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinically significant and practical! Enhancing precision does make a difference. Reply to McGlinchey and Jacobson, Hsu, and Speer.
    Hageman WJ; Arrindell WA
    Behav Res Ther; 1999 Dec; 37(12):1219-33. PubMed ID: 10596468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinically significant but impractical? A response to Hageman and Arrindell.
    McGlinchey JB; Jacobson NS
    Behav Res Ther; 1999 Dec; 37(12):1211-7; discussion 1219-33. PubMed ID: 10596467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the clinical significance of responses by psychiatric inpatients to the mental health subscales of the SF-36.
    Newnham EA; Harwood KE; Page AC
    J Affect Disord; 2007 Feb; 98(1-2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16904752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing clinical significance of treatment outcomes using the DASS-21.
    Ronk FR; Korman JR; Hooke GR; Page AC
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Dec; 25(4):1103-10. PubMed ID: 23730826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of false positive and false negative rates of two indices of individual reliable change: Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods.
    Ferrer-Urbina R; Pardo A; Arrindell WA; Puddu-Gallardo G
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1132128. PubMed ID: 37519369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of three methods of identifying reliable and clinically significant client changes: commentary on Hageman and Arrindell.
    Hsu LM
    Behav Res Ther; 1999 Dec; 37(12):1195-202; discussion 1219-33. PubMed ID: 10596465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in acute psychiatric inpatients: reliability and validity.
    Russo J; Roy-Byrne P; Reeder D; Alexander M; Dwyer-O'Connor E; Dagadakis C; Ries R; Patrick D
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1997 Mar; 185(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 9091598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches to denote treatment outcome: Clinical significance and clinical global impression compared.
    de Beurs E; Carlier IVE; van Hemert AM
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2019 Dec; 28(4):e1797. PubMed ID: 31597212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the anxiety control questionnaire in psychiatric inpatients.
    Lang AJ; McNiel DE
    Depress Anxiety; 2006; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 16400628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of adding the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire to outcome assessments of psychiatric inpatients with mood and affective disorders.
    Hope ML; Page AC; Hooke GR
    Qual Life Res; 2009 Jun; 18(5):647-55. PubMed ID: 19418242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Portuguese version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): Normative data, reliability, and clinical significance cut-offs scores.
    Machado PP; Fassnacht DB
    Psychol Psychother; 2015 Dec; 88(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 25484181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Symptoms, functioning and quality of life after treatment in a residential sub-acute mental health service in Australia.
    Thomas KA; Rickwood DJ; Brown PM
    Health Soc Care Community; 2017 Jan; 25(1):243-254. PubMed ID: 26511110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical significance methods: a comparison of statistical techniques.
    Bauer S; Lambert MJ; Nielsen SL
    J Pers Assess; 2004 Feb; 82(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 14979835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inpatients' assessment of outcome at psychiatric institutions: an analysis of predictors following a national cross-sectional survey in Norway.
    Bjertnaes O; Iversen HH
    BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e023587. PubMed ID: 30530585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring treatment response and outcomes using the World Health Organization's Wellbeing Index in psychiatric care.
    Newnham EA; Hooke GR; Page AC
    J Affect Disord; 2010 Apr; 122(1-2):133-8. PubMed ID: 19592116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in a psychiatric inpatient setting: assessing clinical change.
    Egger ST; Weniger G; Prinz S; Vetter S; Müller M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Apr; 21(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 25644710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity, reliability, acceptability, and utility of the Social Inclusion Questionnaire User Experience (SInQUE): a clinical tool to facilitate social inclusion amongst people with severe mental health problems.
    Mezey G; White S; Harrison I; Bousfield J; Lloyd-Evans B; Payne S; Killaspy H
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):953-964. PubMed ID: 32016512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responsiveness, construct and criterion validity of the Personal Care-Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART).
    Darzins SW; Imms C; Shields N; Taylor NF
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Aug; 13():125. PubMed ID: 26264043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting clinically significant change in an inpatient program for people with severe mental illness.
    Gonda T; Deane FP; Murugesan G
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2012 Jul; 46(7):651-8. PubMed ID: 22528976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.