1584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27268276)
1. How compliant are in vitro fertilization member clinics in following embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 59,689 fresh first in vitro fertilization autologous cycles from 2011 to 2012.
Keyhan S; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):645-652.e1. PubMed ID: 27268276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do donor oocyte cycles comply with ASRM/SART embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 13,393 donor cycles from the SART registry.
Acharya KS; Keyhan S; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 27183048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
JOINT SOGC-CFAS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013.
Mersereau J; Stanhiser J; Coddington C; Jones T; Luke B; Brown MB
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):750-756. PubMed ID: 28923285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion.
;
Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):901-903. PubMed ID: 28292618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of transferring embryos that show no evidence of fertilization at the time of fertilization assessment.
Li M; Lin S; Chen Y; Zhu J; Liu P; Qiao J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):607-11.e2. PubMed ID: 26049055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.
Levi-Setti PE; Cirillo F; Smeraldi A; Morenghi E; Mulazzani GEG; Albani E
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Mar; 35(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 29168022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
Tal R; Seifer DB; Wantman E; Baker V; Tal O
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29331235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic implications of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology embryo transfer guidelines: healthcare dollars saved by reducing iatrogenic triplets.
Lee MS; Evans BT; Stern AD; Hornstein MD
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):189-195.e3. PubMed ID: 27037461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does a frozen embryo transfer ameliorate the effect of elevated progesterone seen in fresh transfer cycles?
Healy MW; Patounakis G; Connell MT; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Levy MJ; Hill MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jan; 105(1):93-9.e1. PubMed ID: 26453267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Day 4 good morula embryo transfer provided compatible live birth rate with day 5 blastocyst embryo in fresh IVF/ET cycles.
Li RS; Hwu YM; Lee RK; Li SH; Lin MH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29458903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the type of gonadotropin-releasing hormone suppression protocol for ovarian hyperstimulation associated with ectopic pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles for in vitro fertilization?
Londra L; Moreau C; Strobino D; Bhasin A; Zhao Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 27320035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prediction of clinical outcomes of patients with surplus cleavage-stage embryos for blastocyst culture after D3 embryo transfer].
Jin HX; Wang SS; Song WY; Dai SJ; Li G; Yao GD; Shi SL; Liu Y; Zhang FL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 99(46):3627-3632. PubMed ID: 31826584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]