These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27268571)

  • 1. Examining the effects of adult and peer mediated goal setting and feedback interventions for writing: Two studies.
    Alitto J; Malecki CK; Coyle S; Santuzzi A
    J Sch Psychol; 2016 Jun; 56():89-109. PubMed ID: 27268571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Programming generality into a performance feedback writing intervention: A randomized controlled trial.
    Hier BO; Eckert TL
    J Sch Psychol; 2016 Jun; 56():111-31. PubMed ID: 27268572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the impact of feedback on elementary aged students' fluency growth in written expression: a randomized controlled trial.
    Truckenmiller AJ; Eckert TL; Codding RS; Petscher Y
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Dec; 52(6):531-48. PubMed ID: 25432270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of curriculum-based measurement on teachers' instructional planning.
    Fuchs LS; Fuchs D; Stecker PM
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Jan; 22(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 2649628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating elementary-aged students' abilities to generalize and maintain fluency gains of a performance feedback writing intervention.
    Hier BO; Eckert TL
    Sch Psychol Q; 2014 Dec; 29(4):488-502. PubMed ID: 24708279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation of a peer-led question-writing task.
    Nwosu A; Mason S; Roberts A; Hugel H
    Clin Teach; 2013 Jun; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 23656675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do sixth-grade writers need process strategies?
    Torrance M; Fidalgo R; Robledo P
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Mar; 85(1):91-112. PubMed ID: 25583519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of goal setting, contingent reward, and instruction on writing skills.
    Hansen BD; Wills HP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 24114533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring annual growth using written expression curriculum-based measurement: An examination of seasonal and gender differences.
    Keller-Margulis MA; Mercer SH; Payan A; McGee W
    Sch Psychol Q; 2015 Jun; 30(2):276-288. PubMed ID: 25133462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of classwide curriculum-based measurement and peer tutoring: a collaborative researcher-practitioner interview study.
    Phillips NB; Fuchs LS; Fuchs D
    J Learn Disabil; 1994; 27(7):420-34. PubMed ID: 7930936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect on performance of timely feedback on state writing assessments.
    Crehan KD; Curfman M
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):1015-21. PubMed ID: 12841478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalizability theory reliability of written expression curriculum-based measurement in universal screening.
    Keller-Margulis MA; Mercer SH; Thomas EL
    Sch Psychol Q; 2016 Sep; 31(3):383-392. PubMed ID: 26322656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent validity and classification accuracy of curriculum-based measurement for written expression.
    Furey WM; Marcotte AM; Hintze JM; Shackett CM
    Sch Psychol Q; 2016 Sep; 31(3):369-382. PubMed ID: 26618507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midterm peer feedback in problem-based learning groups: the effect on individual contributions and achievement.
    Kamp RJ; van Berkel HJ; Popeijus HE; Leppink J; Schmidt HG; Dolmans DH
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Mar; 19(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 23657726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.
    Geithner CA; Pollastro AN
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26847256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of a highly explicit, teacher-directed strategy instruction routine: changing the writing performance of students with learning disabilities.
    Troia GA; Graham S
    J Learn Disabil; 2002; 35(4):290-305. PubMed ID: 15493239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of mastery experiences, performance feedback, and task effort to elementary-aged students' self-efficacy in writing.
    Hier BO; Mahony KE
    Sch Psychol Q; 2018 Sep; 33(3):408-418. PubMed ID: 28857589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in written expression for students who are deaf or hard of hearing.
    Cheng SF; Rose S
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(4):503-15. PubMed ID: 19564174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment.
    Adwan J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Jun; 41():67-72. PubMed ID: 27138485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving Teachers' Comprehension of Curriculum-Based Measurement Progress-Monitoring Graphs.
    van den Bosch RM; Espin CA; Pat-El RJ; Saab N
    J Learn Disabil; 2019; 52(5):413-427. PubMed ID: 31221014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.