201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27268649)
1. Ultrasound Breast Elastographic Evaluation of Mass-Forming Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ with Histological Correlation - New Findings for a Toothpaste Sign.
Leong LC; Sim LS; Jara-Lazaro AR; Tan PH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(5):2673-8. PubMed ID: 27268649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography?
Vinnicombe SJ; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie CA; Jordan LB; Hubbard S; Evans AJ
Eur Radiol; 2014 Apr; 24(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 24326756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical application of a color map pattern on shear-wave elastography for invasive breast cancer.
Lee S; Jung Y; Bae Y
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 26979640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual Touch tissue quantification cannot assess breast cancer lesions except for ductal carcinomas in situ and small invasive cancers: a retrospective study.
Tada K; Nishioka K; Kikuchi Y; Niwa T; Seto Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 13():147. PubMed ID: 25886531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stiffness at shear-wave elastography and patient presentation predicts upgrade at surgery following an ultrasound-guided core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Evans A; Purdie CA; Jordan L; Macaskill EJ; Flynn J; Vinnicombe S
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1156-9. PubMed ID: 27499466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial experience of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and ultrasound elastography in predicting breast cancer subtypes and staging.
Wang XL; Tao L; Zhou XL; Wei H; Sun JW
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():130-135. PubMed ID: 27718417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades.
Grajo JR; Barr RG
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 24371107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a Multi-Parametric ultrasonography nomogram for prediction of invasiveness in ductal carcinoma in situ.
Niu Q; Li H; Du L; Wang R; Lin J; Chen A; Jia C; Jin L; Li F
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111415. PubMed ID: 38471320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SONOELASTOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF HIGH-RISK BREAST LESIONS AND DUCTAL CARCINOMA
Crnogorac M; Ivanac G; Tomasović-Lončarić Č; Žic R; Kelava T; Brkljačić B
Acta Clin Croat; 2019 Mar; 58(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 31363320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Density in a Contemporary Cohort of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).
Gooch JC; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Kurz E; Guth A; Lee J; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3472-3477. PubMed ID: 31147991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma
Shi J; Chen L; Wang B; Zhang H; Xu L; Ye J; Liu Y; Shao Y; Sun X; Zou Y
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(3):286-291. PubMed ID: 35899956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only.
Dillon MF; McDermott EW; Quinn CM; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 93(7):559-63. PubMed ID: 16705731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Added Value of Breast MRI for Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Diagnostic Performance on 362 Patients.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Petrillo M; Triunfo F; Filice S; Vallone P; Setola SV; Rubulotta M; Di Bonito M; Rinaldo M; D'Aiuto M; Brunetti A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e127-e134. PubMed ID: 28111130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound Image Classification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast: Analysis of 705 DCIS Lesions.
Watanabe T; Yamaguchi T; Tsunoda H; Kaoku S; Tohno E; Yasuda H; Ban K; Hirokaga K; Tanaka K; Umemoto T; Okuno T; Fujimoto Y; Nakatani S; Ito J; Ueno E
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 28242086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Typical and unusual sonoelastographic patterns of breast cystic lesions: impact on BI-RADS classification.
Chiorean AR; Duma MM; Dudea SM; Bolboaca S; Dumitriu D; Eniu D; Sfrangeu SA
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E138-E144. PubMed ID: 20972948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not necessary in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Kotani H; Yoshimura A; Adachi Y; Ishiguro J; Hisada T; Ichikawa M; Gondou N; Hattori M; Kondou N; Sawaki M; Fujita T; Iwata H
Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 24989112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
