These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2726930)

  • 1. Preliminary report of an intervention to improve mammography skills of radiologists.
    D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A; Costanza ME; Gaw VP
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 293():151-7. PubMed ID: 2726930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gøtzsche's quixotic antiscreening campaign: nonscientific and contrary to Cochrane principles.
    Dean PB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 17411510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening: successes and problems in implementing widespread use in the United States.
    Gold RH; Bassett LW; Fox SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):1039-46. PubMed ID: 3628751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening behaviors and long-term compliance with mammography guidelines in a breast cancer screening program.
    Weinberg AD; Cooper HP; Lane M; Kripalani S
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9037339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACR system enhances mammography reporting.
    Kopans D; D'Orsi C
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Sep; 14(9):125-32. PubMed ID: 10183943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Richardson JL; Mondrus GT; Danley K; Deapen D; Mack T
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8770470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Streamlining mobile mammography services. Concern over loss of quality.
    McCue P
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Dec; 16(12):27-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 10285605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of individual breast cancer screening in the Alpes-Maritimes].
    Fontas P; Bregeault A; Maestro C; Namer M; Obadia Y; Rotily M
    J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 77(9):657-62. PubMed ID: 8944122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Specifications for organized breast cancer screening. Specifications for radiologists].
    J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Spec No 1):1S27-46. PubMed ID: 17211314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversies in mammography.
    Timins JK
    N J Med; 2005; 102(1-2):45-9. PubMed ID: 15790065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography: who, when, and why?
    Markle JT; Massman JE
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1995 Sep; 84(7):335-7. PubMed ID: 7561543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The risks and benefits of screening mammography.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10295360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial commentary: Screening mammography.
    Lawrence W
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 81(4):159. PubMed ID: 12451616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients' reports of counseling on mammography screening by health-care providers--North Carolina, 1997.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1999 May; 48(17):356-8. PubMed ID: 10363960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breast cancer screening. Objectives of a professional structure].
    Taïeb A
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1669-72. PubMed ID: 10188313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should mammography screening be promoted if quality assurance is lacking?
    Barmus B
    Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(1):135. PubMed ID: 8434090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building upon assumptions. An Office of Technology Assessment report examines breast cancer screening for women over 65.
    Tsuchiyama S
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Sep; 10(9):19-20, 23-4. PubMed ID: 10115528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.