408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27270544)
1. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
Maret D; Telmon N; Peters OA; Lepage B; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Peyre A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoacoustic tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography versus micro-computed tomography: Accuracy of 3D reconstructions of human teeth.
Schneider SJM; Höhne C; Schneider M; Schmitter M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0274818. PubMed ID: 36534651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of linear measurement accuracy obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom VG).
Moshfeghi M; Tavakoli MA; Hosseini ET; Hosseini AT; Hosseini IT
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Dec; 9(Suppl 1):S57-62. PubMed ID: 23814563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography image segmentation of isolated tooth roots based on the dynamic threshold method.
Su S; Liu YM; Zhan LP; Gao SY; He C; Zhang Q; Huang XF
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):752. PubMed ID: 37833773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique.
Martorelli M; Ausiello P; Morrone R
J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 24412585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography.
Hassan B; Couto Souza P; Jacobs R; de Azambuja Berti S; van der Stelt P
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 19506922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
Dong T; Xia L; Cai C; Yuan L; Ye N; Fang B
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A method for rapid extracting three-dimensional root model of vivo tooth from cone beam computed tomography data based on the anatomical characteristics of periodontal ligament].
Zhao YJ; Wang SW; Liu Y; Wang Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 28203004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of preemptively constructed, cone beam CT-, and CAD/CAM technology-based, individual Root Analogue Implant technique: an in vitro pilot investigation.
Moin DA; Hassan B; Parsa A; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 23278702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan.
Park SW; Yoon RG; Lee H; Lee HJ; Choi YD; Lee DH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32882986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of detecting vertical root fractures in non-root filled teeth using cone beam computed tomography: effect of voxel size and fracture width.
Guo XL; Li G; Zheng JQ; Ma RH; Liu FC; Yuan FS; Lyu PJ; Guo YJ; Yin S
Int Endod J; 2019 Jun; 52(6):887-898. PubMed ID: 30661246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of automatic segmentation of teeth using a watershed-based method.
Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Telmon N; Calvet A; Michetti J; Maret D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170220. PubMed ID: 28937285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
