These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27270972)
1. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach? Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fertility and neonatal outcomes of embryos achieving blastulation on Day 7: are they of clinical value? Du T; Wang Y; Fan Y; Zhang S; Yan Z; Yu W; Xi Q; Chen Q; Mol BW; Lyu Q; Kuang Y Hum Reprod; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1038-1051. PubMed ID: 29669005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts. Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle. De Vos A; Van Landuyt L; Santos-Ribeiro S; Camus M; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2442-2449. PubMed ID: 27619768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates. Zhan S; Lin C; Lin Q; Gan J; Wang C; Luo Y; Liu J; Du H; Liu H Hum Reprod; 2024 Sep; 39(9):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 38960877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers. Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles. De Vos A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29206936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Bourdon M; Pocate-Cheriet K; Finet de Bantel A; Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Amar Hoffet A; Arbo E; Poulain M; Santulli P Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1948-1964. PubMed ID: 31644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hashimoto S; Amo A; Hama S; Ito K; Nakaoka Y; Morimoto Y Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1528-35. PubMed ID: 23482339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The time aspect in storing vitrified blastocysts: its impact on survival rate, implantation potential and babies born. Wirleitner B; Vanderzwalmen P; Bach M; Baramsai B; Neyer A; Schwerda D; Schuff M; Spitzer D; Stecher A; Zintz M; Zech NH Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2950-7. PubMed ID: 24030587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study. Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Alviggi E; Sansone A; Trabucco E; Dusi L; Buffo L; Barnocchi N; Fiorini F; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Argento C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32951051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing an artificial intelligence algorithm to predict fetal heartbeat of vitrified-warmed blastocysts from a single image: predictive ability in different settings. Conversa L; Bori L; Insua F; Marqueño S; Cobo A; Meseguer M Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct; 39(10):2240-2248. PubMed ID: 39173597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group. Ginström Ernstad E; Spangmose AL; Opdahl S; Henningsen AA; Romundstad LB; Tiitinen A; Gissler M; Wennerholm UB; Pinborg A; Bergh C; Malchau SS Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2282-2289. PubMed ID: 31687765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]