These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27271321)

  • 1. Integrated Computational Solution for Predicting Skin Sensitization Potential of Molecules.
    Sarath Kumar KL; Tangadpalliwar SR; Desai A; Singh VK; Jere A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155419. PubMed ID: 27271321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the global performance of eight in silico skin sensitization models using human data.
    Golden E; Macmillan DS; Dameron G; Kern P; Hartung T; Maertens A
    ALTEX; 2021; 38(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 32388570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: from individual test methods towards testing strategies.
    Ezendam J; Braakhuis HM; Vandebriel RJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 90(12):2861-2883. PubMed ID: 27629427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.
    Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 25560674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards AOP application--implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization.
    Patlewicz G; Kuseva C; Kesova A; Popova I; Zhechev T; Pavlov T; Roberts DW; Mekenyan O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):529-45. PubMed ID: 24928565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces.
    Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of in silico tools to predict the skin sensitization potential of chemicals.
    Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 28105856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules.
    Snyder RD; Pearl GS; Mandakas G; Choy WN; Goodsaid F; Rosenblum IY
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 43(3):143-58. PubMed ID: 15065202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials.
    Mehling A; Eriksson T; Eltze T; Kolle S; Ramirez T; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Aug; 86(8):1273-95. PubMed ID: 22707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The unreliability of the reliability criteria in the estimation of QSAR for skin sensitivity: A pun or a reliable law?
    Toropov AA; Toropova AP
    Toxicol Lett; 2021 Apr; 340():133-140. PubMed ID: 33484841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a multiparametric in vitro model of skin sensitization.
    Guyard-Nicodème M; Gerault E; Platteel M; Peschard O; Veron W; Mondon P; Pascal S; Feuilloley MG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 24496914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.
    Sakaguchi H; Ryan C; Ovigne JM; Schroeder KR; Ashikaga T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1810-20. PubMed ID: 20510347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin sensitization: modeling based on skin metabolism simulation and formation of protein conjugates.
    Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Patlewicz GY; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MH; Phillips RD; Niemela J; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(4):189-204. PubMed ID: 16126613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of selected global (Q)SARs/expert systems for the prediction of skin sensitisation potential.
    Patlewicz G; Aptula AO; Uriarte E; Roberts DW; Kern PS; Gerberick GF; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Ryan CA; Basketter DA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(5-6):515-41. PubMed ID: 17654336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.
    Fitzpatrick JM; Patlewicz G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 28423913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of genotoxic potential of cosmetic ingredients by an in silico battery system consisting of a combination of an expert rule-based system and a statistics-based system.
    Aiba née Kaneko M; Hirota M; Kouzuki H; Mori M
    J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 40(1):77-98. PubMed ID: 25743748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hapten-protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization.
    Divkovic M; Pease CK; Gerberick GF; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):189-200. PubMed ID: 16191014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.