These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27272291)

  • 21. RhD negative women. Are we ready to change practice?
    Wray J
    Pract Midwife; 2000 Oct; 3(9):26-8. PubMed ID: 12026547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevention of post-transfusion RhD immunization using red cell exchange and intravenous anti-D immunoglobulin.
    Laspina S; O'riordan JM; Lawlor E; Murphy WG
    Vox Sang; 2005 Jul; 89(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 15938740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Prevention of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia fetal maternal rhesus].
    Poissonnier MH
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 18228707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Antenatal anti-Rh(D) antigen prophylaxis].
    Katsulov A;
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40 Suppl 5():3-7. PubMed ID: 11785354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rhesus isoimmunization.
    Plevyak MP; Carr SR
    Med Health R I; 2001 May; 84(5):148-51. PubMed ID: 11392951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Kleihauer testing. Many cases of sensitisation may be avoidable.
    Murphy WG; Ghosh S; Hughes RH; Craig JI; Greer IA
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6957):806. PubMed ID: 7848430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Kleihauer testing. Need not be abandoned.
    Love EM; Shwe KH
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6957):805. PubMed ID: 7950581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Errors in anti-D immunoglobulin administration: retrospective analysis of 15 years of reports to the UK confidential haemovigilance scheme.
    Bolton-Maggs PH; Davies T; Poles D; Cohen H
    BJOG; 2013 Jun; 120(7):873-8. PubMed ID: 23489292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Hemolytic disease of the newborn has not vanished from Finland--routine protection of RhD negative mothers during pregnancy is justifiable].
    Sainio S; Kuosmanen M
    Duodecim; 2012; 128(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 22372070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Biological markers: what changes with prophylaxis?].
    Mannessier L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S9-11. PubMed ID: 18228706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the immunologic basis of Rh immune globulin (anti-D) prophylaxis.
    Kumpel BM
    Transfusion; 2006 Sep; 46(9):1652-6. PubMed ID: 16965599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochrane made simple. Anti-D administration during pregnancy for preventing Rhesus isoimmunisation.
    Anderson T
    Pract Midwife; 1999 Jun; 2(6):10. PubMed ID: 10481667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Antenatal anti-Rh(D) antigen prophylaxis of Rh/-/- pregnancy in women on first consultation at the St. Sofia Obstetrics-Gynecology Hospital -- Sofia].
    Katsulov A; Iankov M; Zlateva K; Blagova A; Gogova K; Savova S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40 Suppl 5():7-8. PubMed ID: 11785356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anti-D. Part 2: Risks and benefits.
    Wickham S
    Pract Midwife; 1999 Jun; 2(6):38-9. PubMed ID: 10481677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Consensus Conference on anti-D prophylaxis, 7-8 April 1997.
    Br J Haematol; 1997 Jun; 97(4):927-8. PubMed ID: 9217199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Is it always necessary to give anti-D gamma-globulins in the case of spontaneous miscarriage in Rhesus-negative patients?].
    Salvat J; Slamani L; Capilna M; Brescu O
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 Apr; 25(4):V-IX. PubMed ID: 9229512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anti-D administration after childbirth for preventing Rhesus isoimmunisation.
    Anderson T
    Pract Midwife; 1999 May; 2(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 12024602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Should the RhD prophylaxis be adjusted?].
    Georgsen J; Sprogøe U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Aug; 166(36):3072. PubMed ID: 15446237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. More on Rhogam.
    Keutzer B
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2000; (56):68-9; author reply 69. PubMed ID: 11984911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rhogam: do midwives hold the evidence?
    Wickham S
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1998; (46):34-5. PubMed ID: 10338629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.