These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2727301)

  • 1. Surgical sponges: "delegated responsibility" issue. Case in point: Ravi v. Williams (536 So. 2d 1374--AL (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Apr; 29(11):2. PubMed ID: 2727301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical sponge found 14 yrs, later: nurses sued. Case in point: Melendez v. Beal (683 S.W. 2d 869--TK).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Apr; 25(11):4. PubMed ID: 3846312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurse and the law. More on foreign bodies.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jul; 22(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 1530525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal case briefs for nurses. PA: "on-premises-on-call": compensation issue; CO.: intoxicated patient: contributory negligence.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Oct; 29(5):3. PubMed ID: 3200995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sponge count botched--discovery & silence. Case in point: Simon v. Smith (470 So. 2d 941 - LA).
    Tammeleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Oct; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 3852351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurses, doctors and sponge counts: liability.
    Tammeleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Mar; 26(10):1. PubMed ID: 3634408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responsibility in the OR proves a difficult issue.
    Klann SS; Palmer PN
    AORN J; 1984 Apr; 39(5):820, 823, 826-7. PubMed ID: 6563887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Avoiding legal risks in the O.R.
    Rabinow J
    Nurs Life; 1985; 5(6):24-6. PubMed ID: 3851217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Winnipeg's pediatric cardiac inquest--a nursing perspective.
    Youngson CJ
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1999 Dec; 17(4):7-12. PubMed ID: 10711050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can doctors rely on nurses' sponge counts? Case in point: Van Hook v. Anderson (824 P. 2d 509--WA (1992)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):2. PubMed ID: 1603936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical towel left in pt.: were nurses responsible? Case on point: Hodesh v. Korlitz, 2008-Ohio-2052 (05/02/2008) -OH.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jun; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 18686888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. O.R. nurses: important trial witnesses. Case in point: Stevens v. Union Memorial Hospital (424 A. 2d 1118 - MD.).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1981 Apr; 21(11):4. PubMed ID: 6908732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caveat for nurse-inventors: legal issues. Case in point: Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. (402 N.W. 2d 66-MN).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Jun; 28(1):2. PubMed ID: 3648830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gauze pad left in pt. during reversal of tubal ligation surgery. Case on point: Houserman v. Garrett, 2004 WL 2829112.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Dec; 45(7):4. PubMed ID: 15675762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal case briefs for nurses. AL.: Wrong anesthetic: vicarious liability. N.C.: Incorrect needle count: complications.
    Tamelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jun; 30(1):3. PubMed ID: 2748848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 6 1/2 inch scissor clamp left in patient. Case in point: Fox v. Oklahoma Memorial Hosp. (774 P. 2d 459--OK (1989)).
    Tammalleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Sep; 30(4):4. PubMed ID: 2594978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurse refused to assist in abortion: demoted! Case in point: Kenny v. Ambulatory Centre of Miami (400 So. 2d 1262 - FLA.).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1981 Nov; 22(6):4. PubMed ID: 6914689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. O.R. nurse testifies as "expert" re negligence of O.R. tech. Case on point: Healthtrust, Inc. v. Cantrell 689 So. 2d 822--AL (1997).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 May; 37(12):2. PubMed ID: 9277269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.