233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27273394)
1. Flat-Panel CT Imaging for Individualized Pitch Mapping in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jiam NT; Pearl MS; Carver C; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 27273394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jiam NT; Gilbert M; Cooke D; Jiradejvong P; Barrett K; Caldwell M; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb; 145(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30477013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.
Skinner MW; Ketten DR; Holden LK; Harding GW; Smith PG; Gates GA; Neely JG; Kletzker GR; Brunsden B; Blocker B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 3(3):332-50. PubMed ID: 12382107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flat-Panel CT for Cochlear Implant Electrode Imaging: Comparison to Multi-Detector CT.
Kennedy TA; Connell N; Szczykutowicz T; Schafer S; Royalty K; Nace S; Gartrell B; Gubbels S
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Dec; 37(10):1646-1653. PubMed ID: 27668790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position From Intraoperative Post-insertion Skull Radiographs: A Validation Study.
Svrakic M; Friedmann DR; Berman PM; Davis AJ; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1486-91. PubMed ID: 26375970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of Extracochlear Electrodes: Computerized Tomography Scans, Cochlear Implant Maps, and Operative Reports.
Holder JT; Kessler DM; Noble JH; Gifford RH; Labadie RF
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):e325-e331. PubMed ID: 29738386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of electrode array length on frequency-place mismatch and speech perception with cochlear implants.
Venail F; Mathiolon C; Menjot de Champfleur S; Piron JP; Sicard M; Villemus F; Vessigaud MA; Sterkers-Artieres F; Mondain M; Uziel A
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 25678235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.
Trieger A; Schulze A; Schneider M; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 20962701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea.
Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ; Dekker DM; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2014 Sep; 315():10-24. PubMed ID: 24975087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Accurate and Individualized Preoperative Estimation Method for the Linear Insertion Depth of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays Based on Computed Tomography.
Jia G; Song Z; Wu L; Sun Q; Sheng Y; Ni Y; Li H; Li W
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1036-1042. PubMed ID: 36864593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-operative evaluation of computed tomography imaging following cochlear implantation.
Kaul VF; Brannan Z; Keith J; Hittle B; Riggs W; Hiss M; Varadarajan V; Zhan K; Powell K; Wiet GJ; Adunka OF
Am J Otolaryngol; 2024; 45(1):104081. PubMed ID: 37820391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Johnson AD; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
