These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27274187)
1. Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Yaoeda K; Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Fukuchi T Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():829-34. PubMed ID: 27274187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma. Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients. Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okimoto S PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170206. PubMed ID: 28095506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraocular pressure measurement by three different tonometers in primary congenital glaucoma. Zareei A; Razeghinejad MR; Nowroozzadeh MH; Mehrabi Y; Aghazadeh-Amiri M J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2015; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26005552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals. Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry. Güngör SG; Akman A; Yazici AC J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 24145288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes. Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang H; Sun Z; Li L; Sun R; Zhang H BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 31924174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes]. Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Refinement of Intraocular Pressure Measurements made by Ocular Response Analyzer following Laser in Situ Keratomileusis using M2 90 Moria Microkeratome for Egyptian Myopic and Astigmatic Patients. Refai TA; Hassanin OA Electron Physician; 2016 Dec; 8(12):3429-3433. PubMed ID: 28163860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA. Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure. Zhang Y; Bian A; Hang Q; Li L; Zhang S; Cheng G; Zhou Q Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):749-756. PubMed ID: 36958304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-Contact and Contact Tonometry in Corneal Edema. Gür Güngör S; Akman A; Küçüködük A; Asena L; Şimşek C; Yazici AC Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 93(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26583789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparation of the new rebound tonometer IOPen and the Goldmann tonometer, and their relationship to corneal properties. Moreno-Montañés J; Gosende I; Caire J; García-Granero M Eye (Lond); 2011 Jan; 25(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20885426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure]. Hager A; Schroeder B; Sadeghi M; Grossherr M; Wiegand W Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun; 104(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 17587093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]