164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27274341)
1. Diagnostic efficacy of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Misra D; Panjwani S; Rai S; Misra A; Prabhat M; Gupta P; Talukder SK
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 27274341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the status of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer.
Dangore-Khasbage S; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Banode PJ; Bhake A; Choudhary MS; Lohe VK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19272807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of B-Mode and Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
Rohan K; Ramesh A; Sureshkumar S; Vijayakumar C; Abdulbasith KM; Krishnaraj B
Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9819. PubMed ID: 32953329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Naik RM; Pai A; Guruprasad Y; Singh R
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Jun; 12(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 24431828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: Can it reduce the need of histopathology/cytopathology?
Pattanayak S; Chatterjee S; Ravikumar R; Nijhawan VS; Vivek Sharma ; Debnath J
Med J Armed Forces India; 2018 Jul; 74(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 30093765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of color doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer patients.
Jayachandran S; Sachdeva SK
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):557-8. PubMed ID: 23257501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential diagnosis of lymph node lesions: a semiquantitative approach with colour Doppler ultrasound.
Steinkamp HJ; Mueffelmann M; Böck JC; Thiel T; Kenzel P; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):828-33. PubMed ID: 9828794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography.
Chang DB; Yuan A; Yu CJ; Luh KT; Kuo SH; Yang PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of sonoelastography in predicting pediatric cervical lymph node malignancy.
Zakaria OM; Mousa A; AlSadhan R; Sultan TA; Eid AF; Daoud MY; Al-Taher A; Zakaria HM; Swaroop K; El-Gibaly AM; Al-Arfaj H; Abdelbary EM
Pediatr Surg Int; 2018 Aug; 34(8):885-890. PubMed ID: 30003330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic Evaluation of Cervical Lymphadenopathy; Comparison of Metastatic and Reactive Lymph Nodes in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Gray Scale and Doppler Techniques.
Ghafoori M; Azizian A; Pourrajabi Z; Vaseghi H
Iran J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 12(3):e11044. PubMed ID: 26528381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture.
Tschammler A; Ott G; Schang T; Seelbach-Goebel B; Schwager K; Hahn D
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 9646801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of Sonoelastography in Differentiating Benign From Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes and Correlating With Pathology.
Vineela E; Sakalecha AK; Narayanrao Suresh T
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e22984. PubMed ID: 35415051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The place of CEUS in distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes: a prospective study.
Poanta L; Serban O; Pascu I; Pop S; Cosgarea M; Fodor D
Med Ultrason; 2014 Mar; 16(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24567918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of microvascular flow imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for blood flow analysis of cervical lymph node lesions.
Wang T; Xu M; Xu C; Wu Y; Dong X
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 85(3):249-259. PubMed ID: 37694358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasonographic and histopathological features of cervical lymph node metastases.
Genes I; Mogoantă CA; Lostun G; Lostun A; Mózes H; Műhlfay G
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(2):369-75. PubMed ID: 24969988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
