These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27274365)

  • 1. Avoiding negative reviewer comments: common statistical errors in anesthesia journals.
    Lee S
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2016 Jun; 69(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 27274365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study.
    van Lent M; IntHout J; Out HJ
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e007961. PubMed ID: 26423849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals.
    Fernandes-Taylor S; Hyun JK; Reeder RN; Harris AH
    BMC Res Notes; 2011 Aug; 4():304. PubMed ID: 21854631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The panacea statistical toolbox of a biomedical peer reviewer.
    Skaik Y
    Pak J Med Sci; 2015; 31(4):999-1001. PubMed ID: 26430447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does bad inference drive out good?
    Marozzi M
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 25974387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New ways of insulin delivery.
    Heinemann L
    Int J Clin Pract Suppl; 2011 Feb; (170):31-46. PubMed ID: 21323811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial policy of Magnesium Research: general considerations on the quality criteria for biomedical papers and some complementary guidelines for the contributors of Magnesium Research. Society for the Development on Magnesium Research.
    Durlach J
    Magnes Res; 1995 Sep; 8(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 8845283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA; Crawford GH; Lu DW; Kantor J; Margolis DJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of statistical methods and errors in the articles published in the korean journal of pain.
    Yim KH; Nahm FS; Han KA; Park SY
    Korean J Pain; 2010 Mar; 23(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20552071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonparametric statistical tests for the continuous data: the basic concept and the practical use.
    Nahm FS
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2016 Feb; 69(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 26885295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal.
    Lukić IK; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 11593496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overview of biostatistics used in clinical research.
    De Muth JE
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 19106347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lies, damn lies and statistics: errors and omission in papers submitted to INJURY 2010-2012.
    Prescott RJ; Civil I
    Injury; 2013 Jan; 44(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 23182752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Continuing evolution of statistical tests in medical research].
    Totaro A; Volpe A; Sacco E; Pinto F; Palma M; Bassi P
    Urologia; 2010; 77(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 21234865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.