133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27274560)
1. Comparison of fracture loads of CAD/CAM and conventionally fabricated temporary fixed dental prostheses after different aging regimens.
Edelhoff D; Schraml D; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 27274560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture load of milled polymeric fixed dental prostheses as a function of connector cross-sectional areas.
Wimmer T; Ender A; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 24079564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens.
Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Trottmann A; Özcan M; Fischer J; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Dec; 16(6):1669-77. PubMed ID: 22209963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique.
Peñate L; Basilio J; Roig M; Mercadé M
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 25935084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations.
Alt V; Hannig M; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 21176946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Load bearing capacity of fiber-reinforced and unreinforced composite resin CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed dental prostheses.
Başaran EG; Ayna E; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 23395334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling.
Yao J; Li J; Wang Y; Huang H
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):649-57. PubMed ID: 24721504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
Shahin R; Tannous F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fatigue behavior of zirconia-ceramic, galvano-ceramic, and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures.
Eroğlu Z; Gurbulak AG
J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):516-522. PubMed ID: 23735078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of two methods of reinforcement on the fracture strength of interim fixed partial dentures.
Fahmy NZ; Sharawi A
J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 19432757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media.
Liebermann A; Wimmer T; Schmidlin PR; Scherer H; Löffler P; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):321-8.e2. PubMed ID: 26548869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of PMMA and resin matrix composite-based interim FPD materials.
Lang R; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Handel G
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 12956492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses with various pontics.
Perea L; Matinlinna JP; Tolvanen M; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
J Adhes Dent; 2014 Apr; 16(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 24179988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of abutment model materials on the fracture loads of three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Wimmer T; Erdelt KJ; Eichberger M; Roos M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater J; 2014; 33(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 25017020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture analysis of CAD-CAM high-density polymers used for interim implant-supported fixed, cantilevered prostheses.
Yilmaz B; Alp G; Seidt J; Johnston WM; Vitter R; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 29310879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.
Stawarczyk B; Basler T; Ender A; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle C
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
