BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2727475)

  • 1. The bias of the sample proportion following a group sequential phase II clinical trial.
    Chang MN; Wieand HS; Chang VT
    Stat Med; 1989 May; 8(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 2727475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple and efficient bias-reduced estimator of response probability following a group sequential phase II trial.
    Guo HY; Liu A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 16078384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the estimation of the binomial probability in multistage clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Kim KM
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):881-96. PubMed ID: 15027078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the log-normal mean.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2251-64. PubMed ID: 9802182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supplementary analysis of probabilities at the termination of a group sequential phase II trial.
    Liu A; Wu C; Yu KF; Gehan E
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1009-27. PubMed ID: 15565737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of conditional bias-adjusted estimators for interim analysis in clinical trials with survival data.
    Shimura M; Gosho M; Hirakawa A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2067-2080. PubMed ID: 28211076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Point estimation following a two-stage group sequential trial.
    Grayling MJ; Wason JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Feb; 32(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 36384365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional estimation using prior information in 2-stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early.
    Shimura M; Maruo K; Gosho M
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):400-413. PubMed ID: 29687592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints.
    Di Stefano F; Pannaux M; Correges A; Galtier S; Robert V; Saint-Hilary G
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(10):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 35098579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction of bias in estimating the frequency of recessive genes.
    Huether CA; Murphy EA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1980 Mar; 32(2):212-22. PubMed ID: 7386457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation After a Group Sequential Trial.
    Milanzi E; Molenberghs G; Alonso A; Kenward MG; Tsiatis AA; Davidian M; Verbeke G
    Stat Biosci; 2015 Oct; 7(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 26478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of secondary endpoints in two-stage phase II oncology trials.
    Kunz CU; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4352-68. PubMed ID: 22930470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
    Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on point estimation of the hazard ratio in exponential distributions.
    Lui KJ; Rhodes P
    Stat Med; 1990 Oct; 9(10):1167-73. PubMed ID: 2247717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid report on estimating incidence from cross-sectional data.
    DeMonte JB; Neilan AM; Loop MS; Ciaranello AL; Hudgens MG
    Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 53():106-108.e1. PubMed ID: 32979470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional bias of point estimates following a group sequential test.
    Fan XF; DeMets DL; Lan KK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 May; 14(2):505-30. PubMed ID: 15206542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimised point estimators for multi-stage single-arm phase II oncology trials.
    Grayling MJ; Mander AP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 32(6):817-831. PubMed ID: 35196204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interval estimation of risk ratio in the simple compliance randomized trial.
    Lui KJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 16820329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of the binomial probabilities in a two-stage phase II clinical trial with two co-primary endpoints.
    Sun Y; Zhang X; Tan X; Tu D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 105():106390. PubMed ID: 33819639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. P-value calculation for multistage phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Owzar K; George SL; Lee T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(6):765-75; discussion 777-83. PubMed ID: 17146978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.