These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2727478)

  • 1. Estimation of a common odds ratio in paired-cluster randomization designs.
    Donner A; Hauck W
    Stat Med; 1989 May; 8(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 2727478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of data arising from a stratified design with the cluster as unit of randomization.
    Donner A; Donald A
    Stat Med; 1987; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 3576016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo evaluation of five interval estimators for the relative risk in sparse data.
    Lui KJ
    Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 16544818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Notes on interval estimation of the generalized odds ratio under stratified random sampling.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 23611192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data.
    Greenland S; Robins JM
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 4005387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interval estimation of the proportion ratio under multiple matching.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1275-85. PubMed ID: 15565736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of a common odds ratio in case-control studies of familial aggregation.
    Donner A; Hauck W
    Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):369-78. PubMed ID: 3390505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymptotic and exact interval estimators of the common odds ratio under the sequential parallel comparison design.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3074-3085. PubMed ID: 30156122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimators of the Mantel-Haenszel variance consistent in both sparse data and large-strata limiting models.
    Robins J; Breslow N; Greenland S
    Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):311-23. PubMed ID: 3741973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five interval estimators for proportion ratio under a stratified randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):613-26. PubMed ID: 17634977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalized Mantel-Haenszel estimators for K 2 x J tables.
    Greenland S
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 2720051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient estimation of Pareto model: Some modified percentile estimators.
    Bhatti SH; Hussain S; Ahmad T; Aslam M; Aftab M; Raza MA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196456. PubMed ID: 29715280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimators and confidence intervals for the proportion using binary auxiliary information with applications to pharmaceutical studies.
    Rueda M; Muñoz JF; Arcos A; Álvarez E; Martínez S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):526-54. PubMed ID: 21442524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The large-sample relative efficiency of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator in the fixed-strata case.
    Donner A; Hauck WW
    Biometrics; 1986 Sep; 42(3):537-45. PubMed ID: 3567287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interval estimation of risk ratio in the simple compliance randomized trial.
    Lui KJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 16820329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pairwise cluster randomization: an exposition.
    Rhodes W
    Eval Rev; 2014 Jun; 38(3):217-50. PubMed ID: 25015261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.