These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27275234)

  • 1. Hook Wire Localization Procedure and Early Detection of Breast Cancer - Our Experience.
    Dimitrovska MJ; Mitreska N; Lazareska M; Jovanovska ES; Dodevski A; Stojkoski A
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2015 Jun; 3(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 27275234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Value of Hook Wire Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Lesions.
    Demiral G; Senol M; Bayraktar B; Ozturk H; Celik Y; Boluk S
    J Clin Med Res; 2016 May; 8(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 27081425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of hook wire localization biopsy under imaging guidance for nonpalpable breast lesions detected radiologically.
    Masroor I; Afzal S; Shafqat G; Rehman H
    Int J Womens Health; 2012; 4():445-9. PubMed ID: 23071414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wired for Surgical Success: Our Experience with Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Wire Localization of Impalpable Breast Lesions.
    Balakrishnan SS; Dev B; Gnanavel H; Chinnappan S; Palanisamy P; Hlondo L
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 31(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 34316120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
    Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior breast cancer - mammographic and ultrasonographic features.
    Janković A; Nadrljanski M; Karapandzić VP; Ivanović N; Radojicić Z; Milosević Z
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Nov; 70(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 24397199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology].
    Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ultrasound examination of breast microcalcifications: luxury or necessity?].
    Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Ben Taaritt I; Fournol M
    J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Pt 1):1849-58. PubMed ID: 17213769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
    Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.
    Ball CG; Butchart M; MacFarlane JK
    Can J Surg; 2002 Aug; 45(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 12174979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Performance of users in tropical areas with the BI-RADS classification of breast lesions for predicting malignancy].
    Gonsu Kamga JE; Moifo B; Sando Z; Guegang Goudjou E; Nko'o Amvene S; Gonsu Fotsin J
    Med Sante Trop; 2013; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24334372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
    Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI-guided wire localization open biopsy is safe and effective for suspicious cancer on breast MRI.
    Wang HY; Zhao YN; Wu JZ; Wang Z; Tang JH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(5):1715-8. PubMed ID: 25773814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?
    Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-mass breast lesions on ultrasound: final outcomes and predictors of malignancy.
    Park JW; Ko KH; Kim EK; Kuzmiak CM; Jung HK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Sep; 58(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 28114809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.
    Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.