926 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27276939)
1. Toward a W4-F12 approach: Can explicitly correlated and orbital-based ab initio CCSD(T) limits be reconciled?
Sylvetsky N; Peterson KA; Karton A; Martin JM
J Chem Phys; 2016 Jun; 144(21):214101. PubMed ID: 27276939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extrapolating MP2 and CCSD explicitly correlated correlation energies to the complete basis set limit with first and second row correlation consistent basis sets.
Hill JG; Peterson KA; Knizia G; Werner HJ
J Chem Phys; 2009 Nov; 131(19):194105. PubMed ID: 19929044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Basis set convergence of CCSD(T) equilibrium geometries using a large and diverse set of molecular structures.
Spackman PR; Jayatilaka D; Karton A
J Chem Phys; 2016 Sep; 145(10):104101. PubMed ID: 27634245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of Reaction Barriers and Thermochemical Properties with Explicitly Correlated Coupled-Cluster Methods: A Basis Set Assessment.
Zhang J; Valeev EF
J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Sep; 8(9):3175-86. PubMed ID: 26605729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the accuracy of explicitly correlated coupled-cluster interaction energies--have orbital results been beaten yet?
Patkowski K
J Chem Phys; 2012 Jul; 137(3):034103. PubMed ID: 22830679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An expanded calibration study of the explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b method using large basis set standard CCSD(T) atomization energies.
Feller D; Peterson KA
J Chem Phys; 2013 Aug; 139(8):084110. PubMed ID: 24006977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do CCSD and approximate CCSD-F12 variants converge to the same basis set limits? The case of atomization energies.
Kesharwani MK; Sylvetsky N; Köhn A; Tew DP; Martin JML
J Chem Phys; 2018 Oct; 149(15):154109. PubMed ID: 30342453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some Observations on Counterpoise Corrections for Explicitly Correlated Calculations on Noncovalent Interactions.
Brauer B; Kesharwani MK; Martin JM
J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Sep; 10(9):3791-9. PubMed ID: 26588524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmark theoretical study of the π-π binding energy in the benzene dimer.
Miliordos E; Aprà E; Xantheas SS
J Phys Chem A; 2014 Sep; 118(35):7568-78. PubMed ID: 24761749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation consistent basis sets for molecular core-valence effects with explicitly correlated wave functions: the atoms B-Ne and Al-Ar.
Hill JG; Mazumder S; Peterson KA
J Chem Phys; 2010 Feb; 132(5):054108. PubMed ID: 20136306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prototypical π-π dimers re-examined by means of high-level CCSDT(Q) composite ab initio methods.
Karton A; Martin JML
J Chem Phys; 2021 Mar; 154(12):124117. PubMed ID: 33810692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional and Explicitly Correlated ab Initio Benchmark Study on Water Clusters: Revision of the BEGDB and WATER27 Data Sets.
Manna D; Kesharwani MK; Sylvetsky N; Martin JML
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jul; 13(7):3136-3152. PubMed ID: 28530805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revisiting the Atomic Natural Orbital Approach for Basis Sets: Robust Systematic Basis Sets for Explicitly Correlated and Conventional Correlated ab initio Methods?
Neese F; Valeev EF
J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Jan; 7(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 26606216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation consistent basis sets for explicitly correlated wavefunctions: pseudopotential-based basis sets for the post-d main group elements Ga-Rn.
Hill JG; Peterson KA
J Chem Phys; 2014 Sep; 141(9):094106. PubMed ID: 25194363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Localized-Orbital Coupled-Cluster Approaches for the Conformational Energies of Longer
Santra G; Martin JML
J Phys Chem A; 2022 Dec; 126(50):9375-9391. PubMed ID: 36508714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation consistent basis sets for explicitly correlated wavefunctions: valence and core-valence basis sets for Li, Be, Na, and Mg.
Hill JG; Peterson KA
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Sep; 12(35):10460-8. PubMed ID: 20603665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. W4 theory for computational thermochemistry: In pursuit of confident sub-kJ/mol predictions.
Karton A; Rabinovich E; Martin JM; Ruscic B
J Chem Phys; 2006 Oct; 125(14):144108. PubMed ID: 17042580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Explicitly Correlated Methods for Computing High-Accuracy Benchmark Energies for Noncovalent Interactions.
Sirianni DA; Burns LA; Sherrill CD
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):86-99. PubMed ID: 28068770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ab initio and density functional theory reinvestigation of gas-phase sulfuric acid monohydrate and ammonium hydrogen sulfate.
Kurtén T; Sundberg MR; Vehkamäki H; Noppel M; Blomqvist J; Kulmala M
J Phys Chem A; 2006 Jun; 110(22):7178-88. PubMed ID: 16737269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Moderate-Cost Ab Initio Thermochemistry with Chemical Accuracy.
Ganyecz Á; Kállay M; Csontos J
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Sep; 13(9):4193-4204. PubMed ID: 28777574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
