479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27276993)
1. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 26676611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.
Xiang T; Ma P; Ostersen T; Legarra A; Christensen OF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jun; 47(1):54. PubMed ID: 26122927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.
Xiang T; Nielsen B; Su G; Legarra A; Christensen OF
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):936-48. PubMed ID: 27065256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
