These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
802 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27277033)
1. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning. Zhu J; Penfold SN Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images. Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculation in proton therapy using dual energy CT. Lalonde A; Xie Y; Burgdorf B; O'Reilly S; Ingram WS; Yin L; Zou W; Dong L; Bouchard H; Teo BK Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125024. PubMed ID: 31044743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Note: Relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography. Landry G; Dörringer F; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Abascal JFPJ; Peyrin F; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F; Rinaldi I; Parodi K; Rit S Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 30695108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment. Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy. Charyyev S; Wang T; Lei Y; Ghavidel B; Beitler JJ; McDonald M; Curran WJ; Liu T; Zhou J; Yang X Br J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 95(1129):20210644. PubMed ID: 34709948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of relative proton stopping power measurements across patient size using dual- and single-energy CT. Michalak G; Taasti V; Krauss B; Deisher A; Halaweish A; McCollough C Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 28885130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric impact of dual-energy CT tissue segmentation for low-energy prostate brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo study. Remy C; Lalonde A; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Carrier JF; Bouchard H Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025013. PubMed ID: 29260727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison study between single- and dual-energy CT density extraction methods for neurological proton monte carlo treatment planning. van der Heyden B; Almeida IP; Vilches-Freixas G; Van Beveren C; Vaniqui A; Ares C; Terhaag K; Fonseca GP; Eekers DBP; Verhaegen F Acta Oncol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 31646923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment. Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT. Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising. Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer. Rana S; Zheng Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Implementation of Dual-energy CT for Proton Treatment Planning on Pseudo-monoenergetic CT scans. Wohlfahrt P; Möhler C; Hietschold V; Menkel S; Greilich S; Krause M; Baumann M; Enghardt W; Richter C Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 28068248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method. Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration. Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting the single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy treatment planning: a critical look at the stoichiometric method. Gomà C; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235011. PubMed ID: 30474618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system. Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples. Bär E; Lalonde A; Zhang R; Jee KW; Yang K; Sharp G; Liu B; Royle G; Bouchard H; Lu HM Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 29134674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of dual energy CT imaging on dose calculations for pre-clinical studies. Vaniqui A; Schyns LEJR; Almeida IP; van der Heyden B; van Hoof SJ; Verhaegen F Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):181. PubMed ID: 29157265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]