774 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27277033)
1. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculation in proton therapy using dual energy CT.
Lalonde A; Xie Y; Burgdorf B; O'Reilly S; Ingram WS; Yin L; Zou W; Dong L; Bouchard H; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125024. PubMed ID: 31044743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Note: Relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography.
Landry G; Dörringer F; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Abascal JFPJ; Peyrin F; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F; Rinaldi I; Parodi K; Rit S
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 30695108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy.
Charyyev S; Wang T; Lei Y; Ghavidel B; Beitler JJ; McDonald M; Curran WJ; Liu T; Zhou J; Yang X
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 95(1129):20210644. PubMed ID: 34709948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of relative proton stopping power measurements across patient size using dual- and single-energy CT.
Michalak G; Taasti V; Krauss B; Deisher A; Halaweish A; McCollough C
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 28885130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric impact of dual-energy CT tissue segmentation for low-energy prostate brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo study.
Remy C; Lalonde A; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Carrier JF; Bouchard H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025013. PubMed ID: 29260727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison study between single- and dual-energy CT density extraction methods for neurological proton monte carlo treatment planning.
van der Heyden B; Almeida IP; Vilches-Freixas G; Van Beveren C; Vaniqui A; Ares C; Terhaag K; Fonseca GP; Eekers DBP; Verhaegen F
Acta Oncol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 31646923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment.
Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.
Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Implementation of Dual-energy CT for Proton Treatment Planning on Pseudo-monoenergetic CT scans.
Wohlfahrt P; Möhler C; Hietschold V; Menkel S; Greilich S; Krause M; Baumann M; Enghardt W; Richter C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 28068248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting the single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy treatment planning: a critical look at the stoichiometric method.
Gomà C; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235011. PubMed ID: 30474618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Zhang R; Jee KW; Yang K; Sharp G; Liu B; Royle G; Bouchard H; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 29134674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of dual energy CT imaging on dose calculations for pre-clinical studies.
Vaniqui A; Schyns LEJR; Almeida IP; van der Heyden B; van Hoof SJ; Verhaegen F
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):181. PubMed ID: 29157265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
