BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27278831)

  • 1. Investigation of ultrasound image processing to improve perceptibility of microcalcifications.
    Kamiyama N; Okamura Y; Kakee A; Hashimoto H
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2008 Sep; 35(3):97-105. PubMed ID: 27278831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic detection of microcalcifications in breast ultrasound.
    Chang RF; Hou YL; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang JM; Moon WK
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):102901. PubMed ID: 24089929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A statistical model for the ultrasonic backscattered echo from tissue containing microcalcifications.
    Shankar P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 May; 60(5):932-42. PubMed ID: 23661127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of breast microcalcifications using a strain-compounding technique with ultrasound speckle factor imaging.
    Liao YY; Li CH; Tsui PH; Chang CC; Kuo WH; Chang KJ; Yeh CK
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jun; 61(6):955-65. PubMed ID: 24859659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microcalcification detection in 3-d breast ultrasound.
    Chang RF; Huang SF; Wang LP; Chen DR; Moon WK
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():6297-300. PubMed ID: 17281707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microcalcifications versus artifacts: initial evaluation of a new ultrasound image processing technique to identify breast microcalcifications in a screening population.
    Machado P; Eisenbrey JR; Cavanaugh B; Forsberg F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):2321-4. PubMed ID: 25023105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rayleigh-maximum-likelihood bilateral filter for ultrasound image enhancement.
    Li H; Wu J; Miao A; Yu P; Chen J; Zhang Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):46. PubMed ID: 28412952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
    Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms.
    Duarte MA; Alvarenga AV; Azevedo CM; Calas MJ; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Dec; 122(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 26363676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of simulated clustered microcalcifications on mammography].
    Horino K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jun; 58(7):343-8. PubMed ID: 9711073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency decomposition and compounding of ultrasound medical images with wavelet packets.
    Cincotti G; Loi G; Pappalardo M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):764-71. PubMed ID: 11513027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiresolution edge detection using enhanced fuzzy c-means clustering for ultrasound image speckle reduction.
    Tsantis S; Spiliopoulos S; Skouroliakou A; Karnabatidis D; Hazle JD; Kagadis GC
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):072903. PubMed ID: 24989413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved contrast deep optoacoustic imaging using displacement-compensated averaging: breast tumour phantom studies.
    Jaeger M; Preisser S; Kitz M; Ferrara D; Senegas S; Schweizer D; Frenz M
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):5889-901. PubMed ID: 21852726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting breast microcalcifications with high-field MRI.
    de Leeuw H; Stehouwer BL; Bakker CJ; Klomp DW; van Diest PJ; Luijten PR; Seevinck PR; van den Bosch MA; Viergever MA; Veldhuis WB
    NMR Biomed; 2014 May; 27(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 24535752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications.
    Fu JC; Lee SK; Wong ST; Yeh JY; Wang AH; Wu HK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Sep; 29(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 16002263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Sonographic detection of microcalcifications - potential of new method].
    Fischer T; Grigoryev M; Bossenz S; Diekmann F; Bick U; Slowinski T; Thomas A
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 22322544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. B-spline active rays segmentation of microcalcifications in mammography.
    Arikidis NS; Skiadopoulos S; Karahaliou A; Likaki E; Panayiotakis G; Costaridou L
    Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5161-71. PubMed ID: 19070250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):182-95. PubMed ID: 25563259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical issues in breast imaging by vibro-acoustography.
    Alizad A; Whaley DH; Greenleaf JF; Fatemi M
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e217-20. PubMed ID: 16843513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.