These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27278831)

  • 21. Microcalcifications in the breast detected by a color Doppler method using twinkling artifacts: some important discussions based on clinical cases and experiments with a new ultrasound modality called multidetector-ultrasonography (MD-US).
    Tsujimoto F
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Jan; 41(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 27277641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
    Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional reconstruction of fine vascularity in ultrasound breast imaging using contrast-enhanced spatial compounding: in vitro analyses.
    Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Wilkening W; Ermert H
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1155-64. PubMed ID: 18692757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contrast-enhanced X-ray detection of breast microcalcifications in a murine model using targeted gold nanoparticles.
    Cole LE; Vargo-Gogola T; Roeder RK
    ACS Nano; 2014 Jul; 8(7):7486-96. PubMed ID: 24992365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Breast ultrasound despeckling using anisotropic diffusion guided by texture descriptors.
    Gómez Flores W; Pereira WC; Infantosi AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 40(11):2609-21. PubMed ID: 25218452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Zanca F; Chakraborty DP; Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Claus F; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4012-8. PubMed ID: 18841852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of mammographic microcalcifications using gray-level image structure features.
    Dhawan AP; Chitre Y; Kaiser-Bonasso C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(3):246-59. PubMed ID: 18215906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast-Enhanced X-ray Detection of Microcalcifications in Radiographically Dense Mammary Tissue Using Targeted Gold Nanoparticles.
    Cole LE; Vargo-Gogola T; Roeder RK
    ACS Nano; 2015 Sep; 9(9):8923-32. PubMed ID: 26308767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analogic versus digital mammographic examination a radiological study of mammary microcalcifications on 52 surgical samples.
    Di Nubila B; Cassano E; Origgi D; Treviganti R; Bozzini A; Cernigliaro F; Faissola B; Meneghetti L; Renne G; Balestreri N; Luini A; Bellomi M
    Radiol Med; 2003 Oct; 106(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 14612821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
    Higashida Y; Moribe N; Morita K; Katsuda N; Hatemura M; Takada T; Takahashi M; Yamashita J
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study.
    Timberg P; Baath M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2431-7. PubMed ID: 22559613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Building a virtual simulation platform for quasistatic breast ultrasound elastography using open source software: A preliminary investigation.
    Wang Y; Helminen E; Jiang J
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5453-66. PubMed ID: 26328994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
    Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
    Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.
    Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Claus F; Celis V; Geniets C; Provost V; Pauwels H; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 19378737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robust phase-based texture descriptor for classification of breast ultrasound images.
    Cai L; Wang X; Wang Y; Guo Y; Yu J; Wang Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Mar; 14():26. PubMed ID: 25889570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of ultrasound synthetic aperture imaging using bidirectional pixel-based focusing: preliminary phantom and in vivo breast study.
    Kim C; Yoon C; Park JH; Lee Y; Kim WH; Chang JM; Choi BI; Song TK; Yoo YM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2716-24. PubMed ID: 23686939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM?
    Nelson JS; Wells JR; Baker JA; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2538. PubMed ID: 27147364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.