These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27279195)
21. Young scientists in Malaysia have made integrity training fun and relevant. Chau DM Nature; 2020 Nov; 587(7832):9. PubMed ID: 33144704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Iranian physics society striving to prevent misconduct. Akbarzadeh H Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7282):729. PubMed ID: 20148011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of culture in research misconduct. Davis MS Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Face up to fraud. Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7381):237-8. PubMed ID: 22258568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Research ethics. Global research integrity training. Steneck NH Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):552-3. PubMed ID: 23641099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity. Davies SR Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1235-1253. PubMed ID: 30251235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do researchers learn to overlook misbehavior? Heitman E; Anestidou L; Olsen C; Bulger RE Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):49. PubMed ID: 16295264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Higher education: Call for a European integrity standard. Mungiu-Pippidi A; Deca L Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7423):192. PubMed ID: 23135459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The challenges for scientists in avoiding plagiarism. Fisher ER; Partin KM Account Res; 2014; 21(6):353-65. PubMed ID: 24785995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists. Anderson MS; Horn AS; Risbey KR; Ronning EA; De Vries R; Martinson BC Acad Med; 2007 Sep; 82(9):853-60. PubMed ID: 17726390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Conflicting messages concerning current strategies against research misconduct in Japan: a call for ethical spontaneity. Asai A; Okita T; Enzo A J Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 42(8):524-7. PubMed ID: 27099362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Train students to navigate ethical swamps. Allen MA Nature; 2019 Apr; 568(7751):145. PubMed ID: 30971841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards. Giles J Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Research integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts. Khanyile TD; Duma S; Fakude LP; Mbombo N; Daniels F; Sabone MS Curationis; 2006 Mar; 29(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16817491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]