These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat. Bentley P Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Distortions and distractions in the scientific activity]. De Marchi B Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(2):134-5. PubMed ID: 22706368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The road to fraud starts with a single step. Crocker J Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):151. PubMed ID: 22071724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Researcher is arrested for falsifying his results. Dyer O BMJ; 2014 Jun; 348():g4249. PubMed ID: 24965224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Leading by example. Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):229. PubMed ID: 17230151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The time is right to confront misconduct. Macilwain C Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):7. PubMed ID: 22859166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk. Fenning TM Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Scientists behaving badly. Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sense of injustice can lead scientists to act unethically, study finds. Guterman L Chron High Educ; 2006 Apr; 52(33):A21. PubMed ID: 16789294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. China fights fraud with tough tactics and integrity training. Michel MC Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7283):877. PubMed ID: 20164904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Harassment should count as scientific misconduct. MarĂn-Spiotta E Nature; 2018 May; 557(7704):141. PubMed ID: 29743701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Does Exonerating an Accused Researcher Restore the Researcher's Credibility? Greitemeyer T; Sagioglou C PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126316. PubMed ID: 25970441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle. Yong E; Ledford H; Van Noorden R Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):454-7. PubMed ID: 24284713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Bad behaviour does not equal research fraud. Williamson B J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):207; author reply 207. PubMed ID: 12042416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself? Chrousos GP; Kalantaridou SN; Margioris AN; Gravanis A Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Mar; 42(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 22268677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]