138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27279683)
1. A comparative analysis of conventional and SurePath liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A study of 140 cases.
Sharma J; Toi PCh; Siddaraju N; Sundareshan M; Habeebullah S
J Cytol; 2016; 33(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 27279683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples.
Singh VB; Gupta N; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Suri V; Rajwanshi A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25673585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening.
Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of PAP smear and liquid based cytology as a screening method for cervical carcinoma.
Khakwani M; Parveen R; Azhar M
Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(7):1827-1831. PubMed ID: 36246719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar.
Pankaj S; Nazneen S; Kumari S; Kumari A; Kumari A; Kumari J; Choudhary V; Kumar S
Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 30147099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening: An Experience From Pakistan.
Hashmi AA; Naz S; Ahmed O; Yaqeen SR; Irfan M; Asif MG; Kamal A; Faridi N
Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12293. PubMed ID: 33520497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of conventional cytology and a low-cost liquid-based cytology technique, EziPREP™, for cervicovaginal smear reporting: A split sample study.
Gupta R; Yadav R; Sharda A; Kumar D; Sandeep ; Mehrotra R; Gupta S
Cytojournal; 2019; 16():22. PubMed ID: 31803248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial carcinoma detected with SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology: comparison with conventional cytology.
Patel C; Ullal A; Roberts M; Brady J; Birch P; Bulmer JN; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 19207308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liquid-Based Cytology in the Detection of Premalignant Lesions in Patients with "Atypia in Squamous Cells" in Conventional Cytology.
Barrios L; Vizcaíno Y; Benedetti I
J Cytol; 2022; 39(4):148-154. PubMed ID: 36605874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unsatisfactory rate in liquid-based cervical samples as compared to conventional smears: A study from tertiary care hospital.
Gupta N; Bhar VS; Rajwanshi A; Suri V
Cytojournal; 2016; 13():14. PubMed ID: 27382408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears.
Mahajan S; Rajwanshi A; Srinivasan R; Radotra BD; Panda N
J Cytol; 2021; 38(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 35002112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can LBC Completely Replace Conventional Pap Smear in Developing Countries.
Kamineni V; Nair P; Deshpande A
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2019 Feb; 69(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 30814813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the Cellslide
Michelow P; Sherrin A; Rossouw L; Mohaleamolla S; Evans D; Swarts A; Rakhombe N; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
Afr J Lab Med; 2016; 5(1):278. PubMed ID: 28879102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional Pap smear cervical cancer screening in 11 rural counties in Hainan Province, China: analysis of Bethesda system reporting rates for 218,195 women (predominantly ages 35-64 years) screened in China's National Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Rural Areas (NCCSPRA).
Zheng B; Austin RM; Liang X; Wei G; You J; Liang Y; Zhao C
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2017; 6(3):120-125. PubMed ID: 31043262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Shandon PapSpin liquid-based gynecological test: A split-sample and direct-to-vial test with histology follow-up study.
Rimiene J; Petronyte J; Gudleviciene Z; Smailyte G; Krasauskaite I; Laurinavicius A
Cytojournal; 2010 Mar; 7():2. PubMed ID: 20376176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
