156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27280119)
1. Performance of residents using digital images versus glass slides on certification examination in anatomical pathology: a mixed methods pilot study.
Mirham L; Naugler C; Hayes M; Ismiil N; Belisle A; Sade S; Streutker C; MacMillan C; Rasty G; Popovic S; Joseph M; Gabril M; Barnes P; Hegele RG; Carter B; Yousef GM
CMAJ Open; 2016; 4(1):E88-94. PubMed ID: 27280119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized comparison of virtual microscopy and traditional glass microscopy in diagnostic accuracy among dermatology and pathology residents.
Koch LH; Lampros JN; Delong LK; Chen SC; Woosley JT; Hood AF
Hum Pathol; 2009 May; 40(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 19144382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole slide imaging: uses and limitations for surgical pathology and teaching.
Boyce BF
Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jul; 90(5):321-30. PubMed ID: 25901738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic digital cytopathology: Are we ready yet?
House JC; Henderson-Jackson EB; Johnson JO; Lloyd MC; Dhillon J; Ahmad N; Hakam A; Khalbuss WE; Leon ME; Chhieng D; Zhang X; Centeno BA; Bui MM
J Pathol Inform; 2013; 4():28. PubMed ID: 24392242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy among dermatology residents during a simulated in-training examination.
Brick KE; Sluzevich JC; Cappel MA; DiCaudo DJ; Comfere NI; Wieland CN
J Cutan Pathol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 23808673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applications and challenges of digital pathology and whole slide imaging.
Higgins C
Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jul; 90(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25978139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of annotated (vs. non-annotated) digital pathology slides as a teaching tool during dermatology and pathology residencies.
Marsch AF; Espiritu B; Groth J; Hutchens KA
J Cutan Pathol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 24620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation.
Wilbur DC; Brachtel EF; Gilbertson JR; Jones NC; Vallone JG; Krishnamurthy S
J Pathol Inform; 2015; 6():22. PubMed ID: 26110090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing whole slide digital images versus traditional glass slides in the detection of common microscopic features seen in dermatitis.
Vyas NS; Markow M; Prieto-Granada C; Gaudi S; Turner L; Rodriguez-Waitkus P; Messina JL; Jukic DM
J Pathol Inform; 2016; 7():30. PubMed ID: 27563489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study.
Wright AM; Smith D; Dhurandhar B; Fairley T; Scheiber-Pacht M; Chakraborty S; Gorman BK; Mody D; Coffey DM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 May; 137(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 22970841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of using the Omnyx digital pathology system for cytology practice.
Hanna MG; Pantanowitz L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 31272601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and use of a genitourinary pathology digital teaching set for trainee education.
Li L; Dangott BJ; Parwani AV
J Pathol Inform; 2010 May; 1():. PubMed ID: 20805961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience.
Krupinski EA; Tillack AA; Richter L; Henderson JT; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Graham AR; Descour MR; Davis JR; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2006 Dec; 37(12):1543-56. PubMed ID: 17129792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. User attitudes in analyzing digital slides in a quality control test bed: a preliminary study.
Della Mea V; Demichelis F; Viel F; Dalla Palma P; Beltrami CA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 May; 82(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 16632072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole slide images and digital media in pathology education, testing, and practice: the Oklahoma experience.
Fung KM; Hassell LA; Talbert ML; Wiechmann AF; Chaser BE; Ramey J
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2012; 35(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 21965282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital pathology: Attitudes and practices in the Canadian pathology community.
Bellis M; Metias S; Naugler C; Pollett A; Jothy S; Yousef GM
J Pathol Inform; 2013; 4():3. PubMed ID: 23599903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Efficiency in Digital Pathology: A Comparison of Optical Versus Digital Assessment in 510 Surgical Pathology Cases.
Mills AM; Gradecki SE; Horton BJ; Blackwell R; Moskaluk CA; Mandell JW; Mills SE; Cathro HP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 28877052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concordance between digital pathology and light microscopy in general surgical pathology: a pilot study of 100 cases.
Houghton JP; Ervine AJ; Kenny SL; Kelly PJ; Napier SS; McCluggage WG; Walsh MY; Hamilton PW
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1052-5. PubMed ID: 25248822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
