These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27280379)

  • 41. Total Social Costs and Benefits of Long-Distance Hydropower Transmission.
    Calder RSD; Robinson CS; Borsuk ME
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 56(24):17510-17522. PubMed ID: 36446025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hydropeaking mitigation project on a multi-purpose hydro-scheme on Valsura River in South Tyrol/Italy.
    Premstaller G; Cavedon V; Pisaturo GR; Schweizer S; Adami V; Righetti M
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():642-653. PubMed ID: 27657990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tracing institutional surprises in the water-energy nexus: Stalled projects of Chile's small hydropower boom.
    Kelly SH; Negroni JMV
    Environ Plan E Nat Space; 2021 Sep; 4(3):1171-1195. PubMed ID: 34957370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The US Clean Water Act and habitat replacement: evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA.
    Sudol MF; Ambrose RF
    Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 12375092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sustainability and energy development: influences of greenhouse gas emission reduction options on water use in energy production.
    Cooper DC; Sehlke G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3509-18. PubMed ID: 22283709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Model based hydropower gate operation for mitigation of CSO impacts by means of river base flow increase.
    Achleitner S; De Toffol S; Engelhard C; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):87-94. PubMed ID: 16248184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The hydropower myth.
    Williams JM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(12):12882-12888. PubMed ID: 30905017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Realizing ecosystem-safe hydropower from dams.
    Ahmad SK; Hossain F
    Renew Wind Water Sol; 2020; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 32647609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Integrated watershed- and farm-scale modeling framework for targeting critical source areas while maintaining farm economic viability.
    Ghebremichael LT; Veith TL; Hamlett JM
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 114():381-94. PubMed ID: 23195139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The dependence of hydropower planning in relation to the influence of climate in Northeast Brazil.
    Santos NQ; Lima KC; Spyrides MHC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0259951. PubMed ID: 35077461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Examining global electricity supply vulnerability to climate change using a high-fidelity hydropower dam model.
    Turner SWD; Ng JY; Galelli S
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jul; 590-591():663-675. PubMed ID: 28283290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accelerating the Integration of Distributed Water Solutions: A Conceptual Financing Model from the Electricity Sector.
    Quesnel KJ; Ajami NK; Wyss N
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):867-881. PubMed ID: 28823071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Digitalization and real-time control to mitigate environmental impacts along rivers: Focus on artificial barriers, hydropower systems and European priorities.
    Quaranta E; Bejarano MD; Comoglio C; Fuentes-Pérez JF; Pérez-Díaz JI; Sanz-Ronda FJ; Schletterer M; Szabo-Meszaros M; Tuhtan JA
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jun; 875():162489. PubMed ID: 36870504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Modelling mitigation options to reduce diffuse nitrogen water pollution from agriculture.
    Bouraoui F; Grizzetti B
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 468-469():1267-77. PubMed ID: 23998504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. U.S. federal agency models offer different visions for achieving Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) biofuel volumes.
    Keeler BL; Krohn BJ; Nickerson TA; Hill JD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 47(18):10095-101. PubMed ID: 24010884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Recent innovations and trends in in-conduit hydropower technologies and their applications in water distribution systems.
    Sari MA; Badruzzaman M; Cherchi C; Swindle M; Ajami N; Jacangelo JG
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 228():416-428. PubMed ID: 30243077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A multi-time-scale power prediction model of hydropower station considering multiple uncertainties.
    Chen J; Zhong PA
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 677():612-625. PubMed ID: 31067481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Environmental impact assessment of the proposed Information Technology Park at Perungudi.
    Sharmilaa G
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Oct; 49(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 18476382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Modeling the suitability of potential wetland mitigation sites with a geographic information system.
    Van Lonkhuyzen RA; LaGory KE; Kuiper JA
    Environ Manage; 2004 Mar; 33(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 15031767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.