These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27280448)

  • 1. Bayesian analysis of factorial designs.
    Rouder JN; Morey RD; Verhagen J; Swagman AR; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):304-321. PubMed ID: 27280448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Love J; Marsman M; Jamil T; Ly A; Verhagen J; Selker R; Gronau QF; Dropmann D; Boutin B; Meerhoff F; Knight P; Raj A; van Kesteren EJ; van Doorn J; Šmíra M; Epskamp S; Etz A; Matzke D; de Jong T; van den Bergh D; Sarafoglou A; Steingroever H; Derks K; Rouder JN; Morey RD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):58-76. PubMed ID: 28685272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A tutorial on the analysis of experiments using BANOVA.
    Wedel M; Dong C
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Jun; 27(3):433-450. PubMed ID: 34914478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis.
    Campbell JI; Thompson VA
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1255-65. PubMed ID: 22437511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
    Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computing Bayes factors from data with missing values.
    Hoijtink H; Gu X; Mulder J; Rosseel Y
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):253-268. PubMed ID: 29999379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Analysis of Multi-Factorial Experimental Designs Using SEM.
    Langenberg B; Helm JL; Mayer A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(4):716-737. PubMed ID: 38984637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Introduction to Calculating Bayes Factors in JASP for Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Brydges CR; Gaeta L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4523-4533. PubMed ID: 31830850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses.
    Gu X; Mulder J; Hoijtink H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):229-261. PubMed ID: 28857129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.
    Quintana DS; Williams DR
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian hypothesis testing for single-subject designs.
    de Vries RM; Morey RD
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 23458719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. baymedr: an R package and web application for the calculation of Bayes factors for superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority designs.
    Linde M; van Ravenzwaaij D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):279. PubMed ID: 38001458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond "Treatment Versus Control": How Bayesian Analysis Makes Factorial Experiments Feasible in Education Research.
    Kassler D; Nichols-Barrer I; Finucane M
    Eval Rev; 2020 Aug; 44(4):238-261. PubMed ID: 30630372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.
    van Doorn J; van den Bergh D; Böhm U; Dablander F; Derks K; Draws T; Etz A; Evans NJ; Gronau QF; Haaf JM; Hinne M; Kucharský Š; Ly A; Marsman M; Matzke D; Gupta ARKN; Sarafoglou A; Stefan A; Voelkel JG; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):813-826. PubMed ID: 33037582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian unknown change-point models to investigate immediacy in single case designs.
    Natesan P; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):743-759. PubMed ID: 28406673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear Bayesian analysis for single case designs.
    Rindskopf D
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 24606974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PFIM 4.0, an extended R program for design evaluation and optimization in nonlinear mixed-effect models.
    Dumont C; Lestini G; Le Nagard H; Mentré F; Comets E; Nguyen TT;
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():217-229. PubMed ID: 29428073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Tutorial on Computing Bayes Factors for Single-Subject Designs.
    de Vries RM; Hartogs BM; Morey RD
    Behav Ther; 2015 Nov; 46(6):809-23. PubMed ID: 26520223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The application of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to different experimental designs in optometry.
    Armstrong RA; Eperjesi F; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 May; 22(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 12090640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prior sensitivity of null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):804-821. PubMed ID: 34570555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.