These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27281701)

  • 1. The Only Constant Is Change: Next Generation Materials and Medical Device Design for Physical and Mental Health.
    Knothe Tate ML; Fath T
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2016 Aug; 5(15):1840-3. PubMed ID: 27281701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Roundtable Discussion: Advances in Imaging Technology Are Bringing Diagnostic Tools to the Bedside.
    Sheffer J; Koford J; Kingsbury J; Powers M; Wainer N
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2018; 52(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 29558186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The parting of the ways? How biomaterials may differ from advanced materials in the next century.
    Williams D
    Med Device Technol; 1999 May; 10(4):8-11. PubMed ID: 10539111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation of medical devices for evaluation.
    Rousselle S; Wicks J
    Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jan; 36(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18337224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biocompatibility: meeting a key functional requirement of next-generation medical devices.
    Helmus MN; Gibbons DF; Cebon D
    Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jan; 36(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 18337223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The 1995 Medical Device Technology raw materials survey.
    Pearson LS
    Med Device Technol; 1995 Sep; 6(7):38-41. PubMed ID: 10155397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays.
    Murr LE; Gaytan SM; Medina F; Lopez H; Martinez E; Machado BI; Hernandez DH; Martinez L; Lopez MI; Wicker RB; Bracke J
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Apr; 368(1917):1999-2032. PubMed ID: 20308113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Materials Advances for Next-Generation Ingestible Electronic Medical Devices.
    Bettinger CJ
    Trends Biotechnol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):575-585. PubMed ID: 26403162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biocompatible medical devices: raise the bar for health care.
    Mertz L
    IEEE Pulse; 2013 Jul; 4(4):16-20. PubMed ID: 25373022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delft conference proceedings editorial 2008: safety and efficacy for new techniques and imaging using new equipment to support European legislation.
    Faulkner K; Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Guest R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):1-2. PubMed ID: 18556783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The JIRA activities for veterinary medical devices].
    Iino T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Jan; 71(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 25672541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precious metals: materials of diversity.
    Baltzer N
    Med Device Technol; 2007 Oct; 18(6):36-7. PubMed ID: 18078181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlling the quality of raw materials.
    Donawa ME
    Med Device Technol; 1998; 9(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10176139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting silicone tubing for device applications.
    Jahn D
    Med Device Technol; 2005 Oct; 16(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 16355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Highly publicized medical device failures have made headlines in the lay press.
    Szycher M
    J Biomater Appl; 1994 Oct; 9(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7782999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Make sure your imaging equipment goes the distance.
    Halverson KA
    J Healthc Resour Manag; 1997 Nov; 15(9):12-5. PubMed ID: 10176839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sharpening the focus: medical imaging in children's hospitals. Interview by BI&T.
    Strauss K
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(5):377-9. PubMed ID: 19842767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cytotoxicity in vitro as the principal parameter for evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices].
    Gruber-Bzura BM
    Wiad Lek; 2017; 70(5):977-981. PubMed ID: 29203752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selecting the right polymer.
    Olson CM
    Med Device Technol; 2009 Oct; 20(6):10-4. PubMed ID: 20302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current problems associated with toxicity evaluation of medical device materials and future research needs.
    Northup SJ
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1989 Aug; 13(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 2676671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.