BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27281747)

  • 1. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carter MJ; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2673-83. PubMed ID: 26026810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Timeline of Motor Preparatory State Prior to Response Initiation: Evidence from Startle.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jan; 397():80-93. PubMed ID: 30471355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
    Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2541-2547. PubMed ID: 31642402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Offline continuous theta burst stimulation over right inferior frontal gyrus and pre-supplementary motor area impairs inhibition during a go/no-go task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():360-367. PubMed ID: 28391033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Carlsen AN; May C; Forgaard CJ; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():36-42. PubMed ID: 25919668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the effect of anticipating a startling acoustic stimulus on preparatory inhibition.
    Grandjean J; Quoilin C; Duque J
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Apr; 49(2):137-147. PubMed ID: 30528379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 15480608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.
    Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ
    J Physiol; 2001 Aug; 535(Pt 1):289-300. PubMed ID: 11507178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of timing preparation during response initiation and execution using a startling acoustic stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 27614459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sub-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied after the go-signal facilitates reaction time under control but not startle conditions.
    Smith V; Carlsen AN
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 47(4):333-345. PubMed ID: 29356214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.
    Carlsen AN; Almeida QJ; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 217(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 22138667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.
    Carlsen AN; Dakin CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 16874516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a startling acoustic stimulus to investigate underlying mechanisms of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease.
    Carlsen AN; Almeida QJ; Franks IM
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):392-9. PubMed ID: 23201535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.
    Alibiglou L; MacKinnon CD
    J Physiol; 2012 Feb; 590(4):919-36. PubMed ID: 22124142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subcortical motor circuit excitability during simple and choice reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 126(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 22642891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Startle reveals an absence of advance motor programming in a Go/No-go task.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Dakin CJ; Sanderson DJ; Inglis JT; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18262355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unexpected acoustic stimulation during action preparation reveals gradual re-specification of movement direction.
    Marinovic W; Tresilian J; Chapple JL; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():23-32. PubMed ID: 28215747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.