1541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27282101)
41. Microbial community profiling of fresh basil and pitfalls in taxonomic assignment of enterobacterial pathogenic species based upon 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
Ceuppens S; De Coninck D; Bottledoorn N; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Uyttendaele M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 257():148-156. PubMed ID: 28666129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Confident phylogenetic identification of uncultured prokaryotes through long read amplicon sequencing of the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon.
Martijn J; Lind AE; Schön ME; Spiertz I; Juzokaite L; Bunikis I; Pettersson OV; Ettema TJG
Environ Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 21(7):2485-2498. PubMed ID: 31012228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform.
Fouhy F; Clooney AG; Stanton C; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 27342980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Hot topic: 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals the microbiome of the virgin and pregnant bovine uterus.
Moore SG; Ericsson AC; Poock SE; Melendez P; Lucy MC
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jun; 100(6):4953-4960. PubMed ID: 28434745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Hybrid-denovo: a de novo OTU-picking pipeline integrating single-end and paired-end 16S sequence tags.
Chen X; Johnson S; Jeraldo P; Wang J; Chia N; Kocher JA; Chen J
Gigascience; 2018 Mar; 7(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 29267858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency.
Myer PR; Smith TP; Wells JE; Kuehn LA; Freetly HC
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129174. PubMed ID: 26030887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47.
Regueira-Iglesias A; Vázquez-González L; Balsa-Castro C; Blanco-Pintos T; Martín-Biedma B; Arce VM; Carreira MJ; Tomás I
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2021; 11():770668. PubMed ID: 35223533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Combining 16S rRNA gene variable regions enables high-resolution microbial community profiling.
Fuks G; Elgart M; Amir A; Zeisel A; Turnbaugh PJ; Soen Y; Shental N
Microbiome; 2018 Jan; 6(1):17. PubMed ID: 29373999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Characterization of Fecal Microbiota with Clinical Specimen Using Long-Read and Short-Read Sequencing Platform.
Wei PL; Hung CS; Kao YW; Lin YC; Lee CY; Chang TH; Shia BC; Lin JC
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Sep; 21(19):. PubMed ID: 32993155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The effect of taxonomic classification by full-length 16S rRNA sequencing with a synthetic long-read technology.
Jeong J; Yun K; Mun S; Chung WH; Choi SY; Nam YD; Lim MY; Hong CP; Park C; Ahn YJ; Han K
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1727. PubMed ID: 33462291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A novel ultra high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing library preparation method for the Illumina HiSeq platform.
de Muinck EJ; Trosvik P; Gilfillan GD; Hov JR; Sundaram AYM
Microbiome; 2017 Jul; 5(1):68. PubMed ID: 28683838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Choice of 16S Ribosomal RNA Primers Impacts Male Urinary Microbiota Profiling.
Heidrich V; Inoue LT; Asprino PF; Bettoni F; Mariotti ACH; Bastos DA; Jardim DLF; Arap MA; Camargo AA
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2022; 12():862338. PubMed ID: 35531325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions.
Claesson MJ; Wang Q; O'Sullivan O; Greene-Diniz R; Cole JR; Ross RP; O'Toole PW
Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Dec; 38(22):e200. PubMed ID: 20880993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. First insights into the microbial diversity in the omasum and reticulum of bovine using Illumina sequencing.
Peng S; Yin J; Liu X; Jia B; Chang Z; Lu H; Jiang N; Chen Q
J Appl Genet; 2015 Aug; 56(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 25604266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Intrinsic challenges in ancient microbiome reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene amplification.
Ziesemer KA; Mann AE; Sankaranarayanan K; Schroeder H; Ozga AT; Brandt BW; Zaura E; Waters-Rist A; Hoogland M; Salazar-García DC; Aldenderfer M; Speller C; Hendy J; Weston DA; MacDonald SJ; Thomas GH; Collins MJ; Lewis CM; Hofman C; Warinner C
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16498. PubMed ID: 26563586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing.
Ranjan R; Rani A; Metwally A; McGee HS; Perkins DL
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Jan; 469(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 26718401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Characterization of bovine ruminal epithelial bacterial communities using 16S rRNA sequencing, PCR-DGGE, and qRT-PCR analysis.
Li M; Zhou M; Adamowicz E; Basarab JA; Guan LL
Vet Microbiol; 2012 Feb; 155(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 21890283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Influence of periparturient and postpartum diets on rumen methanogen communities in three breeds of primiparous dairy cows.
Cersosimo LM; Bainbridge ML; Kraft J; Wright AD
BMC Microbiol; 2016 May; 16():78. PubMed ID: 27141986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Performance comparison of Illumina and ion torrent next-generation sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA-based bacterial community profiling.
Salipante SJ; Kawashima T; Rosenthal C; Hoogestraat DR; Cummings LA; Sengupta DJ; Harkins TT; Cookson BT; Hoffman NG
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 80(24):7583-91. PubMed ID: 25261520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The effect of 16S rRNA region choice on bacterial community metabarcoding results.
Bukin YS; Galachyants YP; Morozov IV; Bukin SV; Zakharenko AS; Zemskaya TI
Sci Data; 2019 Feb; 6():190007. PubMed ID: 30720800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
