410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27283931)
1. The Impact of Optimal Respiratory Gating and Image Noise on Evaluation of Intratumor Heterogeneity on 18F-FDG PET Imaging of Lung Cancer.
Grootjans W; Tixier F; van der Vos CS; Vriens D; Le Rest CC; Bussink J; Oyen WJ; de Geus-Oei LF; Visvikis D; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1692-1698. PubMed ID: 27283931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a new respiratory amplitude-based gating technique in evaluation of upper abdominal PET lesions.
Van Der Gucht A; Serrano B; Hugonnet F; Paulmier B; Garnier N; Faraggi M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 24332351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of 18F-FDG-PET/CT respiratory gating on detected metabolic activity in lung lesions.
Lupi A; Zaroccolo M; Salgarello M; Malfatti V; Zanco P
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Feb; 23(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 19225943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency based gating: An alternative, conformal, approach to 4D PET data utilization.
Kesner AL; Chung JH; Lind KE; Kwak JJ; Lynch D; Burckhardt D; Koo PJ
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1451-61. PubMed ID: 26936729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a free-breathing CT and an expiratory breath-hold CT with regard to spatial alignment of amplitude-based respiratory-gated PET and CT images.
van der Vos CS; Grootjans W; Meeuwis AP; Slump CH; Oyen WJ; de Geus-Oei LF; Visser EP
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Dec; 42(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 25342183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.
Lorsakul A; Li Q; Trott CM; Hoog C; Petibon Y; Ouyang J; Laine AF; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102504. PubMed ID: 25281979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical utility of texture analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with Stage I lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Takeda K; Takanami K; Shirata Y; Yamamoto T; Takahashi N; Ito K; Takase K; Jingu K
J Radiat Res; 2017 Nov; 58(6):862-869. PubMed ID: 29036692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of respiratory motion correction on lesion visibility and quantification in thoracic PET/MR imaging.
Gratz M; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L; Fenchel M; Hong I; Quick HH
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233209. PubMed ID: 32497135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Respiratory-gated PET/CT versus delayed images for the quantitative evaluation of lower pulmonary and hepatic lesions.
Tahari AK; Lodge MA; Wahl RL
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014; 58(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 24438486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Software Gating: A Practical Technology for Respiratory Motion Correction in PET.
Kesner AL; Chung JH; Lind KE; Kwak JJ; Lynch D; Burckhardt D; Koo PJ
Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):239-48. PubMed ID: 27027335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data-driven gating in PET: Influence of respiratory signal noise on motion resolution.
Büther F; Ernst I; Frohwein LJ; Pouw J; Schäfers KP; Stegger L
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3205-3213. PubMed ID: 29782653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
Dong X; Wu P; Sun X; Li W; Wan H; Yu J; Xing L
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25708154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer.
Nehmeh SA; Erdi YE; Ling CC; Rosenzweig KE; Schoder H; Larson SM; Macapinlac HA; Squire OD; Humm JL
J Nucl Med; 2002 Jul; 43(7):876-81. PubMed ID: 12097456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Amplitude-based optimal respiratory gating in positron emission tomography in patients with primary lung cancer.
Grootjans W; de Geus-Oei LF; Meeuwis AP; van der Vos CS; Gotthardt M; Oyen WJ; Visser EP
Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3242-50. PubMed ID: 25097133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of partial volume effect correction and 4D PET in the quantification of FDG avid lung lesions.
Salavati A; Borofsky S; Boon-Keng TK; Houshmand S; Khiewvan B; Saboury B; Codreanu I; Torigian DA; Zaidi H; Alavi A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Feb; 17(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 25080325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Between Static and Parametric 18F-FDG PET Images in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tixier F; Vriens D; Cheze-Le Rest C; Hatt M; Disselhorst JA; Oyen WJ; de Geus-Oei LF; Visser EP; Visvikis D
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26966161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On-the-fly motion-compensated cone-beam CT using an a priori model of the respiratory motion.
Rit S; Wolthaus JW; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2283-96. PubMed ID: 19610317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. List mode-driven cardiac and respiratory gating in PET.
Büther F; Dawood M; Stegger L; Wübbeling F; Schäfers M; Schober O; Schäfers KP
J Nucl Med; 2009 May; 50(5):674-81. PubMed ID: 19372491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of data-driven respiratory gating in clinical F-18 FDG PET/CT: comparison of free breathing and deep-expiration breath-hold CT protocol.
Kang SY; Moon BS; Kim HO; Yoon HJ; Kim BS
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 35(3):328-337. PubMed ID: 33449303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]