These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27285061)

  • 1. Liver Stiffness Measurements with MR Elastography: Agreement and Repeatability across Imaging Systems, Field Strengths, and Pulse Sequences.
    Trout AT; Serai S; Mahley AD; Wang H; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Dillman JR
    Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 27285061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 27715486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements at 1.5- and 3-T Hepatic MR Imaging: Same-Day Agreement among Readers and across Two Imager Manufacturers.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):244-254. PubMed ID: 28212052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Modified Spin-Echo-based Sequences for Hepatic MR Elastography: Evaluation, Comparison with the Conventional Gradient-Echo Sequence, and Preliminary Clinical Experience.
    Mariappan YK; Dzyubak B; Glaser KJ; Venkatesh SK; Sirlin CB; Hooker J; McGee KP; Ehman RL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 27509543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: Normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee DH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23281116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance elastography of healthy livers at 3.0 T: Normal liver stiffness measured by SE-EPI and GRE.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Park SJ; Lee KB; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():46-53. PubMed ID: 30292272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Respiratory-triggered spin-echo echo-planar imaging-based mr elastography for evaluating liver stiffness.
    Wang H; Tkach JA; Trout AT; Dumoulin CL; Dillman JR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):391-396. PubMed ID: 30584687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.
    Wagner M; Besa C; Bou Ayache J; Yasar TK; Bane O; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Sep; 51(9):575-81. PubMed ID: 26982699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.
    Yasar TK; Wagner M; Bane O; Besa C; Babb JS; Kannengiesser S; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1064-72. PubMed ID: 26469708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B and C by Using Both Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging: A Prospective Study.
    Shi Y; Xia F; Li QJ; Li JH; Yu B; Li Y; An H; Glaser KJ; Tao S; Ehman RL; Guo QY
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jun; 111(6):823-33. PubMed ID: 26977760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and Agreement of Shear Wave Speed Measurements in Phantoms and Human Livers Across 6 Ultrasound 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Systems.
    Gilligan LA; Trout AT; Bennett P; Dillman JR
    Invest Radiol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):191-199. PubMed ID: 31977604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements.
    Zhan C; Kannengiesser S; Chandarana H; Fenchel M; Ream J; Shanbhogue KP
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1825-1833. PubMed ID: 30796479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precision and Test-Retest Repeatability of Stiffness Measurement with MR Elastography: A Multicenter Phantom Study.
    Ozkaya E; Kennedy P; Chen J; Bane O; Dillman JR; Jhaveri KS; Ohliger MA; Rossman PJ; Tkach JA; Doucette JT; Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e233136. PubMed ID: 38742971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of hepatic MR elastography across field strengths, pulse sequences, scan intervals, and readers.
    Kim HJ; Kim B; Yu HJ; Huh J; Lee JH; Lee SS; Kim KW; Kim JK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 31720766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance elastography SE-EPI vs GRE sequences at 3T in a pediatric population with liver disease.
    Calle-Toro JS; Serai SD; Hartung EA; Goldberg DJ; Bolster BD; Darge K; Anupindi SA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):894-902. PubMed ID: 30600386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography Techniques for Evaluating Liver Stiffness.
    Morin CE; Dillman JR; Serai SD; Trout AT; Tkach JA; Wang H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W279-W287. PubMed ID: 30300003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two-dimensional spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness.
    Low G; Owen NE; Joubert I; Patterson AJ; Graves MJ; Glaser KJ; Alexander GJ; Lomas DJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):844-50. PubMed ID: 25537823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T.
    Shi Y; Guo Q; Xia F; Sun J; Gao Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 24650683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.
    Wang K; Manning P; Szeverenyi N; Wolfson T; Hamilton G; Middleton MS; Vaida F; Yin M; Glaser K; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2843-2854. PubMed ID: 28612163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas.
    An H; Shi Y; Guo Q; Liu Y
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Oct; 71(10):1068.e7-1068.e12. PubMed ID: 27132114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.