249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27285061)
1. Liver Stiffness Measurements with MR Elastography: Agreement and Repeatability across Imaging Systems, Field Strengths, and Pulse Sequences.
Trout AT; Serai S; Mahley AD; Wang H; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Dillman JR
Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 27285061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.
Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 27715486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements at 1.5- and 3-T Hepatic MR Imaging: Same-Day Agreement among Readers and across Two Imager Manufacturers.
Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):244-254. PubMed ID: 28212052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of Modified Spin-Echo-based Sequences for Hepatic MR Elastography: Evaluation, Comparison with the Conventional Gradient-Echo Sequence, and Preliminary Clinical Experience.
Mariappan YK; Dzyubak B; Glaser KJ; Venkatesh SK; Sirlin CB; Hooker J; McGee KP; Ehman RL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 27509543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: Normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
Lee DH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23281116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance elastography of healthy livers at 3.0 T: Normal liver stiffness measured by SE-EPI and GRE.
Bae JS; Lee JM; Park SJ; Lee KB; Han JK
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():46-53. PubMed ID: 30292272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Respiratory-triggered spin-echo echo-planar imaging-based mr elastography for evaluating liver stiffness.
Wang H; Tkach JA; Trout AT; Dumoulin CL; Dillman JR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):391-396. PubMed ID: 30584687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.
Wagner M; Besa C; Bou Ayache J; Yasar TK; Bane O; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
Invest Radiol; 2016 Sep; 51(9):575-81. PubMed ID: 26982699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.
Yasar TK; Wagner M; Bane O; Besa C; Babb JS; Kannengiesser S; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1064-72. PubMed ID: 26469708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B and C by Using Both Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging: A Prospective Study.
Shi Y; Xia F; Li QJ; Li JH; Yu B; Li Y; An H; Glaser KJ; Tao S; Ehman RL; Guo QY
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jun; 111(6):823-33. PubMed ID: 26977760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability and Agreement of Shear Wave Speed Measurements in Phantoms and Human Livers Across 6 Ultrasound 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Systems.
Gilligan LA; Trout AT; Bennett P; Dillman JR
Invest Radiol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):191-199. PubMed ID: 31977604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements.
Zhan C; Kannengiesser S; Chandarana H; Fenchel M; Ream J; Shanbhogue KP
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1825-1833. PubMed ID: 30796479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision and Test-Retest Repeatability of Stiffness Measurement with MR Elastography: A Multicenter Phantom Study.
Ozkaya E; Kennedy P; Chen J; Bane O; Dillman JR; Jhaveri KS; Ohliger MA; Rossman PJ; Tkach JA; Doucette JT; Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL; Taouli B
Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e233136. PubMed ID: 38742971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of hepatic MR elastography across field strengths, pulse sequences, scan intervals, and readers.
Kim HJ; Kim B; Yu HJ; Huh J; Lee JH; Lee SS; Kim KW; Kim JK
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 31720766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance elastography SE-EPI vs GRE sequences at 3T in a pediatric population with liver disease.
Calle-Toro JS; Serai SD; Hartung EA; Goldberg DJ; Bolster BD; Darge K; Anupindi SA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):894-902. PubMed ID: 30600386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography Techniques for Evaluating Liver Stiffness.
Morin CE; Dillman JR; Serai SD; Trout AT; Tkach JA; Wang H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W279-W287. PubMed ID: 30300003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two-dimensional spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness.
Low G; Owen NE; Joubert I; Patterson AJ; Graves MJ; Glaser KJ; Alexander GJ; Lomas DJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):844-50. PubMed ID: 25537823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T.
Shi Y; Guo Q; Xia F; Sun J; Gao Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 24650683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.
Wang K; Manning P; Szeverenyi N; Wolfson T; Hamilton G; Middleton MS; Vaida F; Yin M; Glaser K; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2843-2854. PubMed ID: 28612163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Test-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas.
An H; Shi Y; Guo Q; Liu Y
Clin Radiol; 2016 Oct; 71(10):1068.e7-1068.e12. PubMed ID: 27132114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
